JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 4 No. 1, January 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Assessment of Documented Foot Examinations for Patients With Diabetes in Inner-city Primary Care Clinics

Judith Wylie-Rosett, EdD, RD; Elizabeth A. Walker, DNSc, RN, CDE; Harry Shamoon, MD; Samuel Engel, MD; Charles Basch, PhD; Patricia Zybert, PhD

Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(1):46-50.


Abstract

Background
The established guidelines for a diabetes foot examination include assessing circulatory, skin, and neurological status to detect problems early and reduce the likelihood of amputation.

Objective
To determine documented adherence with guidelines for foot examinations.

Setting
Four clinics in underserved areas.

Methods
Charts of 350 diabetic patients, identified by billing code, were reviewed for foot examination documentation. A documented foot examination was defined as assessing at least two of the three components of a foot examination. The review determined the periodicity and prevalence of foot examinations, referrals to a podiatrist or vascular surgeon during a 2-year period, and risk factors for foot complications. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine whether risk factors for foot complications predicted foot examination status.

Results
The patients had a mean age and duration of diabetes of 57.7 and 8.8 years, respectively; 86% were black or Hispanic. There was no indication of foot examination or referral for 55.7% of the patients during the 2-year period. Patients with foot care referrals were more likely to have foot examinations by their primary care providers (P=.0001). There was almost a fourfold increase in the odds that patients with diagnosed peripheral vascular disease had foot examinations, with twofold greater odds for each 25-year increase in age.

Conclusions
Populations at risk of diabetic complications are unlikely to have foot examinations in their primary medical care, but having peripheral vascular disease increases the likelihood. Efforts are needed to improve adherence to foot examination guidelines for patients with diabetes from underserved populations.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (Drs Wylie-Rosett and Walker) and Medicine (Drs Shamoon and Engel), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, and the Department of Health Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY (Drs Basch and Zybert).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preventing Amputation
Holman
DOC News 2007;4:6-7.
FULL TEXT  

Dissemination of Diabetes Care Guidelines: Lessons Learned From Community Health Centers
Walker et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2001;27:101-110.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Outpatient Diabetes Management Through a Collaboration of Six Competing, Capitated Medicare Managed Care Plans
Marshall et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2000;15:65-71.
ABSTRACT  

The orientation of health professional students towards the care of older adults: the case of podiatry
Chumbler and Ford
Health (London) 1998;2:259-281.
ABSTRACT  

Practical Criteria for Screening Patients at High Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration
Lavery et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:157-162.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.