JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 4 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Perceived Family Stress as a Predictor of Health-Related Outcomes

George R. Parkerson, Jr, MD, MPH; W. Eugene Broadhead, MD, PhD; Chiu-Kit J. Tse, MSPH

Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(3):253-260.


Abstract

Objective
To measure the predictive effect of patientperceived family stress for health-related outcomes.

Design
Prospective study of patients whose social stress and support were measured by self-report at baseline with the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale and used as predictors of outcomes during an 18-month follow-up period.

Setting
Rural primary care community health clinic.

Patients
Convenience sample of ambulatory adults.

Intervention
None.

Main Outcome Measures
Follow-up (one or more follow-up visits), frequent follow-up (more than six visits), referral and/or hospitalization (one or more), high follow-up severity of illness (upper-tertile mean Duke Severity of Illness Checklist scores), and high follow-up total charges (<=$268).

Results
There were 413 patients with a mean age of 40.4 years. Of these, 58.6% were women; 47.2%, African American; 52.8%, white; 56.7%, married; 77.2%, wage earners or housekeepers; and 52.3% had more than one health problem. At baseline, patients with high self-reported family stress (upper-tertile Duke Social Support and Stress Scale scores) had lower quality of life, functional health, and social support scores and higher dysfunctional health and social stress scores than other patients. High baseline family stress scores (scale of 0 to 100) predicted follow-up (odds ratio [OR]=1.014), frequent follow-up (OR=1.021), referral and/or hospitalization (OR=1.018), high severity of illness at follow-up (OR=1.016), and high follow-up charges (OR=1.018) after controlling for the effects of social support, age, gender, and race. Family stress scores were stronger predictors of these outcomes than the other social stress and support variables.

Conclusion
The finding of patient-perceived family stress as a risk factor for unfavorable health-related outcomes suggests the need for early detection and treatment of family stress by family physicians.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Routine Psychological Screening in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents: A notion whose time has come?
Cameron et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:2716-2724.
FULL TEXT  

Psychosocial Stress and Cervical Neoplasia Risk
Coker et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2003;65:644-651.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Work disability and health-affecting psychosocial problems among patients in general practice
Gulbrandsen et al.
Scand J Public Health 1998;26:96-100.
ABSTRACT  

Stress, Illness, and the Physician
McKay
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:497-498.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.