JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 4 No. 4, April 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice

Robert B. Williams, MD; Myde Boles, PhD; Robert E. Johnson, PhD

Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(4):311-315.


Abstract

Objective
To examine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening test in randomly selected primary care practices.

Design
Chart abstractions of a random selection of 552 men (age, ≥50 years) and physician and practice-level surveys.

Setting
Fifty-eight randomly selected, nonteaching, nongovernmental, primary care practices in a 43-county area in Virginia.

Main Outcome Measures
Documented evidence of PSA screening for asymptomatic male patients and physician self-report on regular (annual or biannual) use of PSA screening.

Results
Of 496 asymptomatic men, 123 (25%) seen in a 1-year period had documentation of PSA screening. Sixty (50%) of 120 asymptomatic men with documentation of a health maintenance examination had a PSA screening, whereas only 63 (17%) of 376 men without health maintenance examination had a PSA screening (X2, P<.001), after adjusting for race, insurance status, and age. Comparison of PSA screening use before and after the November 1992 publication of the American Cancer Society guidelines on PSA screening revealed that PSA screening after the publication date was 26%, compared with 19% before the date (P=.045), adjusting for health maintenance examination and the length of time for which the patient was eligible for screening. Logistic regression on physician self-report of regular vs not regular PSA use found an odds ratio of 6.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.28 to 29.30) for influence of the guidelines and 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.93 to 0.99) for the proportion receiving Medicaid or uninsured in the practice.

Conclusions
Despite controversy over PSA as a screening test, PSA screening has now spread substantially in primary care practice.



Author Affiliations

From the Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing among the Elderly in Community-Based Family Medicine Practices
Hudson et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:257-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Guidelines on Primary Care Physician Use of PSA Screening: Results from the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey
Guerra et al.
Med Decis Making 2008;28:681-689.
ABSTRACT  

Delivery of Cancer Screening: How Important Is the Preventive Health Examination?
Fenton et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:580-585.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation: Comparisons With Mammography and Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
Lemon et al.
AJPH 2001;91:1264-1272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determinants of Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Use in Prostate Cancer Screening by Primary Care Physicians
Austin et al.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:453-458.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.