JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 8 No. 5, September 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pregnancy Probabilities During Use of the Creighton Model Fertility Care System

Margaret P. Howard, CNFPE; Joseph B. Stanford, MD, MSPH

Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:391-402.

Objective  To evaluate pregnancy probabilities during use of the Creighton Model Fertility Care System (CrMS).

Design  Couples who began use of the CrMS were entered into this observational cohort study. Follow-up included detailed reviews of use of the CrMS. Pregnancy probabilities were calculated with both net and gross life-table analysis through 18 months.

Setting  A natural family planning service delivery program based at an urban hospital in Houston, Tex.

Subjects  A group of 701 couples who received instruction in the CrMS were entered into the study. Most couples (93%) were engaged or married. Most women were white (83%), between the ages of 20 and 34 years (88%), and college graduates (58%).

Main Outcome Measure  Pregnancies were classified based on a detailed evaluation involving the pregnant woman (usually with her partner).

Results  At 12 months, the following net pregnancy probabilities were found per 100 couples: method-related pregnancies, 0.14; pregnancies caused by user and/or teacher error, 2.72; pregnancies caused by achieving-related behavior (genital contact during a time known to be fertile), 12.84; unresolved pregnancies, 1.43; and total pregnancies, 17.12. Pregnancy probabilities were similar when stratified by the following reproductive categories: uncomplicated regular cycles, long cycles, discontinuing oral contraceptives, breastfeeding, and other.

Conclusions  Pregnancy probabilities of the CrMS compare favorably with those of other methods of family planning. Most pregnancies result from genital contact during a known fertile time. Women need not have regular cycles to use the CrMS successfully.


From Fertility Care Services, Covenant Health System, Lubbock, Tex (Ms Howard); and the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Dr Stanford). Ms Howard was formerly with the Department of Natural Family Planning, St Joseph's Hospital, Houston, Tex.


RELATED ARTICLE

The Archives of Family Medicine Continuing Medical Education Program
Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(5):383-385.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fertility Awareness-Based Methods: Another Option for Family Planning
Pallone and Bergus
J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:147-157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study
Frank-Herrmann et al.
Hum Reprod 2007;22:1310-1319.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.