JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 9 No. 9, September 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Brief Report
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Are Antibiotics Necessary in the Treatment of Locally Infected Ingrown Toenails?

Alexander M. Reyzelman, DPM; Karla A. Trombello, DPM; Dean J. Vayser, DPM; David G. Armstrong, DPM; Lawrence B. Harkless, DPM

Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:930-932.

Context  A wide variety of generalists and specialists treat locally infected ingrown toenails, with perhaps the most common treatment regimen including resection of the nail border coupled with oral antibiotics.

Objective  To determine whether oral antibiotic therapy is beneficial as an adjunct to the phenol chemical matrixectomy in the treatment of infected ingrown toenails.

Design  We prospectively enrolled healthy patients with infected ingrown toenails. Each patient was randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups that received either 1 week of antibiotics and a chemical matrixectomy simultaneously (group 1), antibiotics for 1 week and then a matrixectomy (group 2), or a matrixectomy alone (group 3).

Setting  Institutional ambulatory outpatient clinic.

Patients  Fifty-four healthy patients with infected ingrown toenails were studied. Patients with immunocompromised states, peripheral vascular disease, or cellulitis proximal to the hallux interphalangeal joint were excluded. Groups were age matched for comparison.

Results  Mean healing times for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 1.9, 2.3, and 2.0 weeks, respectively. Subjects receiving antibiotics and a simultaneous chemical matrixectomy (group 1) healed significantly sooner than those receiving a 1-week course of antibiotics followed by a matrixectomy (group 2). There was not a significant difference in healing time between those that received a chemical matrixectomy alone (group 3) and those that received a matrixectomy coupled with a course of oral antibiotics (group 1).

Conclusion  The use of oral antibiotics as an adjunctive therapy in treating ingrown toenails does not play a role in decreasing the healing time or postprocedure morbidity.


From the Department of Orthopedics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.


RELATED ARTICLE

The Archives of Family Medicine Continuing Medical Education Program
Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(9):887-891.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ingrowing Toenails: Management Practices and Research Outcomes
Weaver et al.
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDS 2004;3:22-34.
ABSTRACT  

Chemical Matrixectomy for Ingrown Toenails: Is There an Evidence Basis to Guide Therapy?
Espensen et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2002;92:287-295.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antibiotics as an adjunct to phenol matrixectomy did not decrease healing time of ingrown toenails
Goldberg
Evid. Based Med. 2001;6:92-92.
FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.