JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 8, August 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Comparison of First-Voided Urine Specimens With Endocervical Swab Specimens for Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Women

James A. Kellogg, PhD; Bruce T. Vanderhoff, MD; John W. Seiple; Mary E. Hick

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(8):672-675.


References
Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.



1. Kellogg JA, Seiple JW, Klinedinst JL, Levisky JS. Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2988-2990. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Ciotti RA, Sondheimer SJ, Nachamkin I. Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence using a cytobrush sampling technique. Genitourin Med. 1988;64:245-246. PUBMED
3. Hipp SS, Han Y, Murphy D. Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:1938-1943. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Howard C, Friedman DL, Leete JK, Christensen ML. Correlation of the percent of positive Chlamydia trachomatis direct fluorescent antibody tests with the adequacy of specimen collection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991;14:233-237. PUBMED
5. Kellogg JA, Seiple JW, Klinedinst JL, Levisky JS. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;114:1223-1227.
6. Kellogg JA, Seiple JW, Murray CL, Levisky JS. Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:1108-1113. FREE FULL TEXT
7. Kent GP, Harrison HR, Berman SM, Keenlyside RA. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: comparison of diagnostic tests with clinical and historical factors. Sex Transm Dis. 1988;15:51-57. PUBMED
8. Lipkin ES, Moncada JV, Shafer M-A, Wilson TE, Schachter J. Comparison of monoclonal antibody staining and culture in diagnosing cervical chlamydial infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:114-117. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Moncada J, Schachter J, Shipp M, Bolan G, Wilber J. Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1863-1866. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Philips RS, Hanff PA, Kaufman RS, Aronson MD. Use of a direct fluorescent antibody test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection in women seeking routine gynecologic care. J Infect Dis. 1987;156:575-581. FREE FULL TEXT
11. Smith JW, Rogers RE, Katz BP, et al. Diagnosis of chlamydial infection in women attending antenatal and gynecologic clinics. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:868-872. FREE FULL TEXT
12. LinJ-S, Jones WE, Yan L, et al. Underdiagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: diagnostic limitations in patients with low-level infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19:259-265. PUBMED
13. Schwebke JR, Clark AM, Pettinger MB, Nsubga P, Stamm WE. Use of a urine enzyme immunoassay as a diagnostic tool for Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:2446-2449. FREE FULL TEXT
14. Chernesky M, Castriciano S, Sellors J, et al. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures. J Infect Dis. 1990;161:124-126. PUBMED
15. Chernesky M, Jang D, Sellors J, et al. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the Chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type. Sex Transm Dis. 1993;20:301-306. PUBMED
16. Sellors JW, Mahony JB, Jang D, et al. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:205-208. FREE FULL TEXT
17. Svensson L-O, Mares I, Olsson S-E. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urinary samples from women. Genitourin Med. 1991;67:117-119. PUBMED