|
|
Women's Triage and Management Preferences for Cervical Cytologic Reports Demonstrating Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance and Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
Daron G. Ferris, MD;
David Kriegel;
Lise Cote, MD;
Mark Litaker, MS;
Lisa Woodward
Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(4):348-353.
References Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.
| |
1. Richart RM, Wright TC. Controversies in the management of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer. 1993;71:1413-1421.
PUBMED
2. Montz FJ, Monk BJ, Fowler JM, Nguyen L. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:385-388.
PUBMED
3. Cox JT, Lorincz AT, Schiffman MH, Sherman ME, Cullen A, Kurman RJ. Human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture appears to be useful in triaging women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:946-954.
PUBMED
4. Hatch KD, Schneider A, Abdel-Nour MW. An evaluation of human papillomavirus testing for intermediate- and high-risk types as triage before colposcopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1150-1157.
PUBMED
5. Wright TC, Sun XW, Koulos J. Comparison of management algorithms for the evaluation of women with low-grade cytologic abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:202-210.
PUBMED
6. Jones DED, Creasman WT, Dombroski RA, Lentz SS, Waeltz JL. Evaluation of the atypical Pap smear. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:544-549.
PUBMED
7. Ferris DG, Payne P, Frisch LE. Cervicography: an intermediate triage test for the evaluation of cervical atypia. J Fam Pract. 1993;37:463-468.
PUBMED
8. Kurman RJ, Henson DE, Herbst AL, Noller KL, Schiffman MH. Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology. JAMA. 1994;271:1866-1869.
FREE FULL TEXT
9. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines: what the family physician should know. Am Fam Physician. 1995;51:1455-1463.
PUBMED
10. Roberts RG. Marriage of practice guidelines and outcomes research. Am Fam Physician. 1995;51:1385-1386.
PUBMED
11. Hlatky MA. Patient preferences and clinical guidelines. JAMA. 1995;273:1219-1220.
FREE FULL TEXT
12. Ferris DG, Miller MD, Wagner P, Walaitis E, Lawler FH. Clinical decision making following abnormal Papanicolaou smear reports. Fam Pract Res J. 1993;13:343-353.
PUBMED
13. Ferris DG. ASCUS/LSIL Pap smear results: critical triage considerations. Am Fam Physician. 1996;53:1057-1066.
PUBMED
14. Campion MJ, Ferris DG, diPaola FM, Reid R, Miller MD, eds. Modern Colposcopy: A Practical Approach. Augusta, Ga: Education Systems Inc; 1991. 15. Zuber T. The minimally abnormal Pap smear: a conservative approach. Am Fam Physician. 1996;53:1042-1057.
PUBMED
16. Eraker SA, Politser P. How decisions are reached: physician and patient. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:262-268.
FREE FULL TEXT
17. Herman JM. The use of patients' preferences in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1985;20:153-156.
PUBMED
18. Hughes KK. Decision making by patients with breast cancer: the role of information in treatment selection. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1993;20:623-628.
PUBMED
19. Laedtke TW, Dignan M. Compliance with therapy for cervical dysplasia among women of low socioeconomic status. South Med J. 1992;85:5-8.
PUBMED
|