JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 4 No. 7, July 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Nutrition, Family Physicians, and Health

J. Lloyd Michener, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(7):587-588.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

SHOULD FAMILY PHYSICIANS be more involved in the nutritional assessment and dietary counseling of their patients? This is an awkward time to raise such a question. Many of us are scrambling simply to take care of the pressing problems that bring patients to our offices. All of us are besieged with the proliferating recommendations that call on family physicians to do more counseling, screening, and educating of patients, often without reimbursement. It would appear that we have enough to do without adding the burden of dealing with obesity, high sodium intake, or inadequate fiber in the diets of our patients.

Nevertheless, this is a task that we need to take on. The evidence is overwhelming that we live in a society in which overconsumption is the major cause of death. We are looked to as the source of dietary advice by our patients, who expect us to advise and counsel . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Durham, NC






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.