JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 4 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Advanced Practice Nurses: Should They Be Independent?-Reply

David R. Rudy, MD, MPH
Chicago Medical School North Chicago, Ill

Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(8):674.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

I appreciate Ruppert's measured response to my editorial' in the January issue of the ARCHIVES. At first blush, it is difficult to disagree with much of what she says. She writes that NPs do not wish to be independently practicing medicine. However, they do wish to be independently practicing nursing. To too many of her colleagues, that means making "nursing diagnoses" (as opposed to "medical diagnoses?"), prescribing nursing treatments, etc. Fine, one is tempted to suppose. However, I am not beguiled by the velvet touch. What is the difference between nursing and medical diagnoses? Some physician must be ultimately in charge because one correctly has the ultimate responsibility. The conversation she and I are having should be between the nurse and the physician in the practice, not in the press or in the legislatures. Collaborative practice requires mutual trust, but such trust must occur on site. The nurse's independence would . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.