Baywood Publishing Company
0047-2433
1541-3802
Journal of Environmental Systems
BWES
300323
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=300323
29
4
4
0
0
0
000029000420020101
Number 4/2002-2003
L80CC8CMN01G
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&id=L80CC8CMN01G
10.2190/F1W9-91QJ-L23V-G507
F1W991QJL23VG507
311
PHOSPHORUS-BASED MANAGEMENT OF BROILER LITTER AS AGRICULTURAL FERTILIZER
311
339
20040803
20040803
20040803
20040803
F1W991QJL23VG507.pdf
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=F1W991QJL23VG507
4
KRISHNA P.
PAUDEL
MURALI
ADHIKARI
ASHUTOSH
LIMAYE
NEIL R.
MARTIN, JR.
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
University of Georgia
University Space Research Association, Huntsville, Alabama
Auburn University, Alabama
We calculated the profitability of using broiler litter as a source of plant nutrients using the phosphorus consistent litter application rule. The cost saving by using litter is 37% over the use of chemical fertilizer alone to meet the nutrient needs of major crops grown in Alabama. In the optimal solution, only a few routes of all the possible routes developed were used for inter- and intra-county litter hauling. If litter is not adopted as the sole source of crop nutrients, the best environmental policy may be to pair the phosphorus consistent rule with taxes, marketable permits, and subsidies.
R. U. Goetz and D. Zilberman, The Dynamics of Spatial Pollution: The Case of Phosphorus Runoff from Agricultural Land, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, pp. 143-163, 2000.
F. H. Johnsen, Economic Analyses of Measures to Control Phosphorus Runoff from Nonpoint Agricultural Sources, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 20, pp. 399-418, 1993.
L. M. J. McCann and K. W. Easter, Differences between Farmer and Agency Attitudes Regarding Policies to Reduce Phosphorus Pollution in the Minnesota River Basin, Review of Agricultural Economics, 21, pp. 189-207, 1999.
Census of Agriculture, USDA/NASS, 1997.
G. D. Schnitkey and M. J. Miranda, The Impact of Pollution Controls on Livestock-Crop Producers, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18, pp. 25-36, 1993.
K. Jones and G. D'Souza. Trading poultry litter at the watershed level: A goal focusing application, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 30, pp. 56-65, 2001.
A. H. Stephenson, T. A. McCaskey, and B. G. Ruffin, A Survey of Broiler Litter Composition and Potential Value as a Nutrient Source, Biological Waste, 34, pp. 1-9, 1990.
C. C. Mitchell, J. O. Donald, and V. W. E. Payne, Work Sheet: Poultry Waste as a Fertilizer, Alabama Cooperative Extension Service, Auburn University, Circular, ANR 244a, 1992.
J. Crews, B. Goodman, and M. Runge, Crop Enterprise Budget, Alabama Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Alabama 36849, 1999.
J. F. Adams, C. C. Mitchell, and H. H. Bryant, Soil Test Fertilizer Recommendations for Alabama Crops, Agronomy and Soils Department Ser. No. 176. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama, 1994.
W. L. Kingery, C. W. Wood, D. P. Dealaney, J. C. Williams, and G. L. Mullines, Impact of Long Term Land Application of Broiler Litter on Environmentally Related Soil Properties, Journal of Environmental Quality, 23, pp. 139-147, 1994.
R. Govindasamy and M. J. Cochran, Implications of Policy Regulations on Land Applications of Poultry Litter, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 27, pp. 85-94, 1998.
D. M. Mitchell, An Examination of Non-Regulatory Methods for Controlling Nonpoint Source Pollution, Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 2001.
M. J. Roberts and M. Spence, Effluent Charges and Licences Under Uncertainty. The Economics of Environment, W. E. Oates (ed.), An Elgar Reference Collection, International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Vol. 20, Eldershot, United Kingdom, pp. 143-158, 1992.
W. J. Baumol and W. E. Oates, The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge University Press, pp. 95-97, 1998.
L. Martin and K. D. Zering, Relationship between Industrialized Agriculture and Environmental Consequences: The Case of Vertical Coordination in Broilers and Hogs, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29, pp. 45-56, 1997.
AFA, Position paper, Eutrophication of Alabama Lakes, Eutrophication Committee of the Alabama Fisheries Association, 18 pp., 1998.
L. S. VanDyke, D. Bosch, and J. W. Pease, Impacts of Within-Farm Soil Variability on Nitrogen Pollution Control Costs, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 31, pp. 149-159, 1999.
S. Reinhard, C. A. K. Lovell, and G. Thijssen, Econometric Estimation of Technical and Environmental Efficiency: An Application to Dutch Dairy Farms, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, pp. 44-60, 1999.
I. Piot-Lepetit and D. Vermersch, Pricing Organic Nitrogen under the Weak Disposibility Assumption: An Application to the French Pig Sector, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49, pp. 85-99, 1998.
M. A. Boland, V. Preckel, and K. A. Foster, Economic Analysis of Phosphorus Reducing Technologies in Pork Production, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23, pp. 468-482, 1998.
D. J. Bosch, M. Zhu, and E. T. Kornegay, Economic Returns from Reducing Poultry Litter Phosphorus with Microbial Phytase, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29, pp. 255-266, 1997.