Baywood Publishing Company
1938-4998
1938-5005
Journal of Workplace Rights
BWWR
121043
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=121043
15
2
2
0
0
0
000015000220100101
Number 2 / 2010-2011
R68814M42G18
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&id=R68814M42G18
10.2190/WR.15.2.c
KR08756237504274
3
Improving Sexual Harassment Protections: An Examination of the Legal Compliance of U.S. University Sexual Harassment Policies
151
167
20120113
20120113
20120113
20120113
KR08756237504274.pdf
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=KR08756237504274
2
Charlie
Penrod
Marcelline
Fusilier
Northwestern State University of Louisiana
American University of Kuwait
One way in which employees are protected from sexually harassing behavior is through the dissemination of effective workplace sexual harassment policies. The adequacy of U.S. state university sexual harassment policies was examined nationwide. Sexual harassment is a worldwide problem that lingers despite the presence of sexual harassment laws requiring employers to design effective sexual harassment policies. U.S. university policies were examined in light of the rules set forth in two American court decisions: <i>Faragher v. City of Boca Raton</i> (1998) and <i>Clark v. UPS</i> (2005). The results of the study supported predictions that universities generally have promulgated sexual harassment policies and have disseminated them online. However, universities have not adequately included several important anti-harassment provisions in their policies. In fact, more than half of the sexual harassment policies were missing at least one recommended element. Recommendations are discussed with a view to exploiting these inadequacies.
<i>Anderson v. Wintco.</i> 2009. 314 Fed. Appx. 135.
Antecol, H., & Cobb-Clark, D. 2003. Does sexual harassment training change attitudes? A view from the federal level. <b><i>Social Science Quarterly</i></b>, 84: 826-842.
<i>Bishop v. Woodbury Clinical Laboratory, Inc.</i> 2010. 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37429.
<i>Burlington Industries v. Ellerth.</i> 1998. 524 U.S. 742.
Chan, D. K.-S., Lam, C. B., Chow, S. Y., & Cheung, S. F. 2008. Examining the jobrelated, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. <b><i>Psychology of Women Quarterly</i></b>, 32: 362-376.
<i>Clark v. UPS.</i> 2005. 400 F.3d 341.
Cochran, C. C., Frazier, P. A., & Olson, A. M. 1997. Predictors of responses to unwanted sexual attention. <b><i>Psychology of Women Quarterly</i></b>, 21: 207-226.
Collar, J. 2010. Wisconsin county DA resigns from office over texts. <b><i>USA Today</i></b>, October 4.
<i>Crouch v. Rifle Coal Company, LLC.</i> 2009. 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119029.
DeSouza, E. R., Pryor, J. B., & Hutz, C. S. 1998. Reactions to sexual harassment charges between North Americans and Brazilians. <b><i>Sex Roles</i></b>, 39: 913-928.
Eberhardt, B., Moser, S., & McFadden, D. 1999. Sexual harassment in small government units: An investigation of policies and attitudes. <b><i>Public Personnel Management</i></b>, 28: 351-364.
EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). 1999. Enforcement guidance: Vicarious employer liability for unlawful harassment by supervisors. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html'>www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html</a>
EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). 2011a. Charge statistics: FY 1997 through FY 2010. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm'>http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm</a>
EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). 2011b. Sexual harassment charges: EEOC and FEPAs combined: FY 1997-FY 2010. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment.cfm'>http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment.cfm</a>
<i>Faragher v. City of Boca Raton.</i> 1998. 524 U.S. 775.
Fiedler, A. M., & Blanco, R. I. 2006. The challenge of varying perceptions of sexual harassment: An international study. <b><i>Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management</i></b>, 7: 274-291.
Fisher, A. B. 1993. Sexual harassment: What to do. <b><i>Fortune</i></b>, August 23.
Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. 2000. The sexual victimization of college women. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf'>http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf</a>
<i>Fleenor v. Hewitt Soap Co.</i> 1996. 81 F.3d 48.
Fowler, L. 1996. Sexual harassment policies: An employer's burden or advantage? <b><i>BYU Journal of Public Law</i></b>, 10: 71-93.
<i>Gallagher v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.</i> 2009. 567 F.3d 263.
Hartmus, D., & Niblock, S. 2000. Elements of a good sexual harassment policy. <b><i>Public Manager</i></b>, 29: 50-55.
Hertzog, J. L., Wright, D., & Beat, D. 2008. There's a policy for that: A comparison of the organizational culture of workplaces reporting incidents of sexual harassment. <b><i>Behavior and Social Issues</i></b>, 17: 169-181.
Hobson, C. J., & Guziewicz, J. 2002. Sexual harassment preventive/protective practices at U.S. colleges and universities. <b><i>College Student Affairs Journal</i></b>, 21(2): 17-29.
Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. 1996. Organizational influences on sexual harassment. In Stockdale, M. S. (Ed.), <b><i>Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies:</i></b> 127-150. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kumar, P. B. V. 2009. Sexual harassment at workplace: A scar on humanity. <b><i>ICFAI Journal of Employment Law</i></b>, 7(1): 12-26.
Lombardi, K. 2009. Sexual assault on campus. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.publicintegrity.org/investigations/campus_assault/articles/entry/1838/'>http://www.publicintegrity.org/investigations/campus_assault/articles/entry/1838/</a>
<i>Mack v. ST Mobile Aerospace Engineering, Inc.</i> 2006. 195 Fed. Appx. 829.
<i>Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson.</i> 1986. 477 U.S. 57.
<i>Miller v. Kenworth of Dothan, Inc.</i> 2002. 277 F.3d 1269.
<i>Monteagudo v. Asociacion de Empleados Del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico.</i> 2009. 554 F.3d 164.
O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Bowes-Sperry, L., Bates, C. A., & Lean, E. R. 2009. Sexual harassment at work: A decade (plus) of progress. <b><i>Journal of Management</i></b>, 35: 503-536.
P'ng, I. P. L. 1983. Strategic behavior in suit, settlement, and trial. <b><i>Bell Journal of Economics</i></b>, 14: 539-550.
Reese, L. A., & Lindenberg, K. E. 2002. Assessing local government sexual harassment policies. <b><i>American Review of Public Administration</i></b>, 32: 295-311.
Reese, L. A., & Lindenberg, K. E. 2004. Employee satisfaction with sexual harassment policies: The training connection. <b><i>Public Personnel Management</i></b>, 33: 99-119.
<i>Sanford v. Main Street Baptist Church Manor Inc.</i> 2009. 327 Fed. Appx. 587.
Sigal, J. 2004. Sexual harassment. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), <b><i>Encyclopedia of applied psychology:</i></b> 393-403. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Sigal, J. 2006. International sexual harassment. <b><i>Annals of the New York Academy of Science</i></b>, 1087: 356-369.
<i>Thornton v. Federal Express.</i> 2008. 530 F.3d 451.
United Nations Statistics Division. 2010. World's women 2000: Statistics and indicators on women and men. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/indwm/wwpub2000work.htm'>http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/indwm/wwpub2000work.htm</a>
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2011. An occupational comparison of private and state colleges and universities. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.bls.gov/oes/'>http://www.bls.gov/oes/</a>
U.S. universities by state. 2010. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.utexas.edu/world/univ/state/'>http://www.utexas.edu/world/univ/state/</a>
<i>Walton v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.</i> 2003. 347 F.3d 1272.
<i>White v. BFI Waste Services, Inc.</i> 2006. 193 Fed. Appx. 283.
Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. 2007. A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. <b><i>Personnel Psychology</i></b>, 60: 127-162.
<i>Wilson v. Tulsa Junior College.</i> 1998. 164 F.3d 534.