Skip Navigation

Institution: CLOCKSS Sign In as Personal Subscriber
Right arrow Return to article


TABLE 3. Selected Results: Internalizing Behaviors.

Author Overall effects: DV exposure and internalizing behavior Gender Age at data collection Recruitment setting Other

Kitzmann et al. (2003) d = .29 in correlational studies d = .40 in group-comparison studies ns effect size difference ns effect size difference Effected outcomes in correlational studies only (categorized in four groups) Reporter status affected outcomesType of study affected outcomes
Wolfe et al. (2003) d = .42 ns effect size difference ns effect size difference n/a Research variables (reporter, recruitment setting) produce larger effect size differences than age, gender, outcome type
Davies (2005) d = .48 ns effect size difference ns effect size difference ns effect size difference (categorized in three groups)
Jacobus (2005) d = .41 ns effect size difference ns effect size difference ns effect size difference (categorized in two groups) ns effect size difference for research variables: publication status, reporter
Sternberg et al. (2006) Children exposed to DV were 2.03 times more likely to show internalizing problems than children in no-violence comparison group (p < .001) ns predictor Significant predictor, compared to ages 4–6: ages 10–14 were 1.65 times more likely to have internalizing problems in clinical range n/a For all groups, more children were in the nonclinical than clinical range

ns = non-significant





Right arrow Return to article