Childhood Immunization Practices of Primary Care Physicians
William J. Hueston, MD;
Rachel L. Meade;
Arch G. Mainous III, PhD
Arch Fam Med. 1992;1(2):225-228.
Abstract
| |
Objective To assess if immunization utilization practices differ between rural and urban primary care physicians in Kentucky.
Design Survey of 200 primary care physicians.
Participants Pediatricians, family physicians, and general practitioners in Kentucky.
Selection Procedures Participants completed a 20-item questionnaire that surveyed selected demographics with regard to the physician and practice, immunizations offered to children, and reasons why the responding physicians did not offer immunizations and where they referred patients for this service.
Results Physicians practicing in rural counties offered immunizations to their patients less frequently than did urban physicians (54% vs 77%). Rural and urban physicians cited immunization costs to patients as the chief reason that immunizations were not used more often and referred patients primarily to county health departments.
Conclusions Rising costs have limited physician use of immunizations in rural areas to a greater extent than that seen in urban areas. This may make access to immunizations more difficult for children living in rural areas.
Author Affiliations
From the Primary Care Division, St Claire Medical Center, Morehead, Ky (Dr Hueston), and the Department of Family Practice, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Ms Meade and Dr Mainous).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Assessing Quality of Care via HEDIS 3.0: Is There a Better Way?
Mainous III and Talbert
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:410-413.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Childhood Immunizations and the Vaccines for Children Program
Lyznicki and Rinaldi
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:728-730.
ABSTRACT
Childhood Immunization Availability in Primary Care Practices: Effects of Programs Providing Free Vaccines to Physicians
Hueston et al.
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:605-609.
ABSTRACT
Delays in Childhood Immunizations in Public and Private Settings
Hueston et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:470-473.
ABSTRACT
|