JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 11, November 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Ethics
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Tomorrow's Prenatal Genetic Testing

Should We Test for 'Minor' Diseases?

Carson Strong, PhD

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(11):1187-1193.


Abstract

New test prenatally for a wide range of fetal genetic characteristics. One consequence will be an expansion of potential reasons for selective abortion following prenatal testing. It will likely become possible for patients to request prenatal testing and abortion not only for serious diseases but also relatively mild diseases, late-onset diseases, treatable diseases, elevated risks for common diseases, and eventually nondisease characteristics, such as height and body build. Two main ethical views concerning prenatal testing have been advocated: (1) Prenatal testing should be restricted to the "most severe" disorders, involving profound retardation, severe physical handicaps, or prolonged physical suffering and (2) Patients' requests for prenatal tests should be honored except for diseases considered to be "too minor." At least two additional views can be identified: (3) Physicians should honor requests for prenatal testing for diseases, including relatively minor ones, but not requests pertaining to nondisease characteristics and (4) All requests for prenatal tests should be honored. A difficulty with the first and second views is that they deviate from the norm of nondirectiveness in prenatal testing and counseling. The problems with the fourth view are that it leads to abortions for morally trivial reasons and that attempts to design our children could adversely affect parent-child relationships and exacerbate current social inequities. These considerations support the third view, which holds that the future role of reproductive genetic testing and counseling should be based on the imperfect, but helpful, distinction between disease and nondisease.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Human Values and Ethics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification
Strong
J. Med. Ethics 2005;31:654-658.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parental Autonomy and the Obligation Not to Harm One's Child Genetically
Green
J Law Med Ethics 1997;25:5-15.
 

Genetic Testing and Traditional Values
O'Connor
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:307-307.
ABSTRACT  

Genetic Testing and Traditional Values-Reply
Strong
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:307-308.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.