JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A Structured Literature Review of Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer

John H. Wasson, MD; Cynthia C. Cushman, MD; Reginald C. Bruskewitz, MD; Benjamin Littenberg, MD; Albert G. Mulley, Jr, MD, MPP; John E. Wennberg, MD, MPH

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(5):487-493.


Abstract

Objective
We performed a structured literature review to define the clinical course of localized prostate cancer, the effectiveness of radical surgery and radiation therapy, and treatment complications.

Article Selection
We identified more than 1600 Englishlanguage, MEDLINE referenced articles for 1966 through 1991. All but 144 were excluded because they lacked primary data, involved fewer than 15 patients, or described neither the course of the disease nor treatment complications.

Data Synthesis
In these 144 articles, persistent genitourinary complications were more common after radical surgery than after external-beam radiation. Radiation resulted in a higher incidence of bowel problems. The median annual risks for the development of distant metastases and cancer-related death were 2.6% and 1.0%, respectively. Because tumor grade was correlated with metastases (Spearman correlation r=.56) and cancer mortality (r=.31), controlling for grade was necessary before we could compare the effectiveness of treatments for these outcomes. However, stratification by grade of malignancy was available in only nine of the patient series describing metastatic rates and in seven describing cancerrelated mortality. Furthermore, in the patient series that described prostate cancer—related metastatic rates, 48% neglected to identify patients unavailable for follow-up, 92% did not stratify patients by age, and only 48% stratified patients by the extent of disease at treatment.

Conclusions
Although we were able to compare complications of treatments, we were unable to determine treatment effectiveness for localized prostate cancer because of methodologic inadequacies in the literature we reviewed. Until better scientific evidence is available, patients and their physicians cannot make informed choices based on knowledge of the benefits of radical prostatectomy, radiation, or watchful waiting.



Author Affiliations

Prostate Disease Patient Outcome Research Team

From the Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Drs Wasson and Wennberg), the Department of Pediatrics (Dr Cushman) and the Technology Assessment Program (Dr Littenberg), Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; the General Internal Medicine Unit of the Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Mulley); and the Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison (Dr Bruskewitz). Dr Littenberg is an American College of Physicians George Morris Piersol teaching and research scholar.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Helping Men Decide About Scheduling a Prostate Cancer Screening Exam
Liberatore et al.
Interfaces 2009;39:209-217.
ABSTRACT  

Time Course and Predictors of Symptoms After Primary Prostate Cancer Therapy
Talcott et al.
JCO 2003;21:3979-3986.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients' Perceptions of Quality of Life After Treatment for Early Prostate Cancer
Clark et al.
JCO 2003;21:3777-3784.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Older Men Benefit From Curative Therapy of Localized Prostate Cancer?
Alibhai et al.
JCO 2003;21:3318-3327.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality: an analysis of mortality change by screening intensity
Coldman et al.
CMAJ 2003;168:31-35.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding and Appreciating Overdiagnosis in the PSA Era
Yao and Lu-Yao
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:958-960.
FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated With Initial Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study
Harlan et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1864-1871.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for prostate cancer in the UK
Donovan et al.
BMJ 2001;323:763-764.
FULL TEXT  

Prostate Cancer Staging: Should MR Imaging Be Used?-A Decision Analytic Approach
Jager et al.
Radiology 2000;215:445-451.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prostate Cancer Practice Patterns and Quality of Life: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study
Potosky et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1719-1724.
FULL TEXT  

Prostate Cancer Tumor Grade Differentiation with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging in the Rat: Comparison of Macromolecular and Small-Molecular Contrast Media-Preliminary Experience
Gossmann et al.
Radiology 1999;213:265-272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Appropriate Selection of Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
Lewis and Rising
Eval Health Prof 1998;21:429-441.
ABSTRACT  

Acute effects of therapeutic irradiation for prostatic carcinoma on anorectal function
Yeoh et al.
Gut 1998;43:123-127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Malpractice Implications of PSA Testing for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer
Collins et al.
J Law Med Ethics 1997;25:234-242.
 

Fifteen-Year Survival in Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Population-Based Study in Sweden
Johansson et al.
JAMA 1997;277:467-471.
ABSTRACT  

Preferences of Husbands and Wives for Prostate Cancer Screening
Volk et al.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:72-76.
ABSTRACT  

Controversies in Prostate Cancer Screening: Analogies to the Early Lung Cancer Screening Debate
Collins and Barry
JAMA 1996;276:1976-1979.
ABSTRACT  

Results of Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Multi-institutional Pooled Analysis
Gerber et al.
JAMA 1996;276:615-619.
ABSTRACT  

Screening for Prostate Cancer with Prostate-Specific Antigen -- An Examination of the Evidence
Woolf
NEJM 1995;333:1401-1405.
FULL TEXT  

Long-term Survival Among Men With Conservatively Treated Localized Prostate Cancer
Albertsen et al.
JAMA 1995;274:626-631.
ABSTRACT  

Medicine--Molecular, Monetary, or More Than Both?
Eisenberg
JAMA 1995;274:331-334.
ABSTRACT  

A 72-Year-Old Man With Localized Prostate Cancer
Albertsen
JAMA 1995;274:69-74.
ABSTRACT  

The Role of Increasing Detection in the Rising Incidence of Prostate Cancer
Potosky et al.
JAMA 1995;273:548-552.
ABSTRACT  

Urology
Chodak
JAMA 1994;271:1717-1718.
ABSTRACT  

Results of Conservative Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
Chodak et al.
NEJM 1994;330:242-248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Men's Health Issues
Konen
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:917-919.
ABSTRACT  

An Assessment of Radical Prostatectomy: Time Trends, Geographic Variation, and Outcomes
Lu-Yao et al.
JAMA 1993;269:2633-2636.
ABSTRACT  

A Decision Analysis of Alternative Treatment Strategies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
Fleming et al.
JAMA 1993;269:2650-2658.
ABSTRACT  

Management of Clinically Localized Prostatic Cancer: An Unresolved Problem
Whitmore
JAMA 1993;269:2676-2677.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.