JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 11, November 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Feasibility and Potential Clinical Usefulness of a Computerized Severity of Illness Measure

George R. Parkerson, Jr, MD, MPH; W. Edward Hammond, PhD; Kimberly S. H. Yarnall, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(11):968-973.


Abstract



Objective
To assess the feasibility and potential clinical usefulness of the computerized Duke Severity of Illness Checklist (DUSOI).

Design
Cross-sectional study of patients whose severity of illness was measured with the DUSOI. Providers assessed the clinical usefulness of the DUSOI and recorded the length of time required for rating severity. Auditors rated severity using progress note information. Demographic and financial data from clinic records were also obtained.

Setting
University-based family practice clinic with 64 621 annual visits.

Patients
Convenience sample of ambulatory patients.

Main Outcome Measures
Clinical usefulness and time required to rate severity.

Results
For 117 patients (63.3% female; mean age, 46.3 years), the mean charge was $105.38,' the mean number of health problems was 2.0, the mean overall provider DUSOI score was 33.7, and the mean auditor DUSOI score was 34.0 (scale=0 to 100). There was excellent agreement between provider and auditor DUSOI scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, .77). Providers required 1.1 minutes to record severity; the principal auditor required 1.6 minutes. Providers found the DUSOI potentially useful in 30.3% of patients. Usefulness was greater in women (38.2% of women vs 18.2% of men), older patients (mean age, 54.5 years in useful group vs 41.9 in nonuseful group), and sicker patients (mean DUSOI score, 55.1 vs 25.9). The DUSOI was more clinically useful in patients with health problems such as type II diabetes mellitus (75.0%) than in those with problems such as tobacco use (25.0%). Higher charges correlated with a higher number of health problems and with female gender but not with severity scores.

Conclusions
The computerized DUSOI is feasible for all patients and is potentially useful for women, older, and sicker patients.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Severity of episodes of care assessed by family physicians and patients: The DUSOI/WONCA as an extension of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)
Okkes et al.
Fam Pract 2002;19:350-356.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treating Depressed Primary Care Patients Improves Their Physical, Mental, and Social Functioning
Coulehan et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1113-1120.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG