JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 5 No. 6, June 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Educating Patients About Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Screening in a Primary Care Setting

Barbara A. Bernhardt, MS; Gary A. Chase, PhD; Ruth R. Faden, PhD, MPH; Gail Geller, ScD; Karen J. Hofman, MD; Ellen S. Tambor, MA; Neil A. Holtzman, MD, MPH

Arch Fam Med. 1996;5(6):336-340.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the effectiveness of education about cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a primary care setting.

Design
Participants were asked to read a brochure, and were offered cystic fibrosis carrier screening. They were assessed for knowledge after reading the brochure and again after having an opportunity to ask questions and reread the brochure at home, at which time consent for testing was obtained.

Setting
Two sites of a health maintenance organization in the Baltimore, Md, area.

Participants
Enrollees in a health maintenance organization, aged 18 to 44 years. Of 608 enrollees approached, 477 completed an initial knowledge questionnaire, and 143 consented to testing.

Main Outcome Measure
Change in knowledge score.

Results
Knowledge scores improved from a mean of 69% correct initially to 75% at the time of consent (P<.01, Student's paired t test). When participants were stratified by educational attainment, significant improvement was observed only for participants with no more than a high school education. However, their final knowledge score was significantly lower than that of college graduates.

Conclusions
For people with more formal education, printed materials augmented by a chance to ask questions may be sufficient to ensure informed consent. For less well-educated persons, additional education may be necessary to ensure understanding of difficult concepts.



Author Affiliations

From the School of Medicine (Mss Bernhardt and Tambor and Drs Geller, Hofman, and Holtzman), and the School of Hygiene and Public Health (Ms Bernhardt and Drs Chase, Faden, Geller, and Holtzman), The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Participation in preconceptional carrier couple screening: characteristics, attitudes, and knowledge of both partners
Henneman et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2001;38:695-703.
FULL TEXT  

Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Adult-Onset Cancer: The Process and Content of Informed Consent
Geller et al.
JAMA 1997;277:1467-1474.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.