JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 5 No. 9, October 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Continuous Quality Improvement Can Improve Glycemic Control for HMO Patients With Diabetes

Patrick J. O'Connor, MD, MPH; William A. Rush, PhD; Jackie Peterson, RN; Pamela Morben, RN; Linda Cherney, RD, MPH; Cheryl Keogh, RN; Susan Lasch, RN, NP-C

Arch Fam Med. 1996;5(9):502-506.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the impact of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) intervention on glycemic control of patients with diabetes mellitus attending a primary care clinic.

Methods
A CQI process designed by the Minnesota Department of Health to improve diabetes care was implemented at a volunteer clinic, with another similar clinic not using the CQI process assessed for comparison. Adults with diabetes were identified at both clinics using diagnostic and pharmacy databases. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) values (reference range, 4.3%-6.1%) and outpatient utilization and charges were compared for all patients with diabetes at each clinic for the 12 months before and 18 months after initiation of the CQI intervention.

Results
The mean HbAlc value at the intervention clinic fell from 8.9% at baseline to 8.4% at 12 months and to 7.9% at 18 months. The mean HbAlc value at the comparison clinic was 8.9% at baseline, 8.9% at 12 months, and 8.8% at 18 months (difference between clinics, t=4.13, P<.001). Differences after the intervention in the proportion of patients at the comparison clinic (n=121) vs the intervention clinic (n=122) with HbAlc values of 8% or less (40% vs 51%), between 8% and 10% (33% vs 37%), and 10% or greater (27% vs 12%) were unlikely due to chance ({chi}2=9.7, 2 df, P=.008). The intervention was not associated with increased utilization of outpatient visits or outpatient charges.

Conclusions
Involvement of nurses, physicians, and managers in a CQI process can improve patients' glycemic control in some health maintenance organization primary care settings, without increasing utilization or charges. Health maintenance organizations should consider CQI as one possible method to improve diabetes outcomes.



Author Affiliations

From HealthPartners, Minneapolis, Minn (Dr O'Connor and Mss Peterson, Morben, and Keogh); Group Health Foundation, Minneapolis (Drs O'Connor and Rush and Ms Cherney); and the Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis (Ms Lasch).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Opportunities and Challenges for Diabetes Prevention at Two Community Health Centers
Rosal et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:247-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Funnell et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2007;33:599-614.
FULL TEXT  

Use of Chronic Care Model Elements Is Associated With Higher-Quality Care for Diabetes
Nutting et al.
Ann Fam Med 2007;5:14-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Mensing et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:S96-S103.
FULL TEXT  

A Taxonomy for Disease Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Disease Management Taxonomy Writing Group
Krumholz et al.
Circulation 2006;114:1432-1445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.
Shojania et al.
JAMA 2006;296:427-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventions to Improve Diabetes Self-management: Utility and Relevance for Practice.
Leeman
The Diabetes Educator 2006;32:571-583.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Mensing et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:S78-S85.
FULL TEXT  

Feasibility and Effectiveness of System Redesign for Diabetes Care Management in Rural Areas: The Eastern North Carolina Experience
Bray et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2005;31:712-718.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Trial of Quality Improvement Intervention to Improve Diabetes Care in Primary Care Settings
O'Connor et al.
Diabetes Care 2005;28:1890-1897.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Adherence-Enhancing Interventions: A Quality Assessment of the Evidence
Elliott et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2005;39:508-515.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Mensing et al.
Diabetes Care 2005;28:S72-S79.
FULL TEXT  

Diabetes Translation Research: Where Are We and Where Do We Want To Be?
Venkat Narayan et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:958-963.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes Quality Improvement in Department of Veterans Affairs Ambulatory Care Clinics: A group-randomized clinical trial
Reiber et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:B61-B68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Mensing et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:s143-143.
FULL TEXT  

Lipid Testing Among Patients With Diabetes Who Receive Diabetes Care From Primary Care Physicians
Massing et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:1369-1373.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electronic Medical Records and Diabetes Care Improvement: Are we waiting for Godot?
O'Connor
Diabetes Care 2003;26:942-943.
FULL TEXT  

National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Mensing et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:s149-156.
FULL TEXT  

Adherence to American Diabetes Association Standards of Care by Rural Health Care Providers
Coon and Zulkowski
Diabetes Care 2002;25:2224-2229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness---which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports
Weingarten et al.
BMJ 2002;325:925-925.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring and Improving Preventive Care for Patients With Diabetes in Primary Health Centers
Harwell et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2002;17:179-184.
ABSTRACT  

The role of patient, physician and systemic factors in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Brown et al.
Fam Pract 2002;19:344-349.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventions to Improve the Management of Diabetes in Primary Care, Outpatient, and Community Settings: A systematic review
Renders et al.
Diabetes Care 2001;24:1821-1833.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequency of Blood Glucose Monitoring in Relation to Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Harris
Diabetes Care 2001;24:979-982.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Oregon Health Plan: Predictors of office-based diabetic quality of care
Srinivasan et al.
Diabetes Care 2001;24:262-267.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Mensing et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2000;26:611-626.
 

Use of Continuous Quality Improvement to Identify Barriers in the Management of Hypertension
Coleman et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2000;15:72-77.
ABSTRACT  

Patients and Community Together: A Family Medicine Community-Oriented Primary Care Project in an Urban Private Practice
Bayer and Fiscella
Arch Fam Med 1999;8:546-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.