JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 5 No. 9, October 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BRIEF REPORTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Managed Care Physician Groups

Edward Fang; Brian S. Mittman, PhD; Scott Weingarten, MD, MPH

Arch Fam Med. 1996;5(9):528-531.


Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of clinical guidelines as a tool to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of health care. Yet, relatively little data are available regarding the use of guidelines by health care provider organizations. We developed a written descriptive survey investigating the development, implementation, and evaluation of clinical guidelines that was administered to medical directors or their designees from physician medical groups and independent practice associations. Eighty-seven percent of physician organizations were reported to be developing or implementing clinical guidelines. The reasons most often cited for developing clinical guidelines were quality improvement and cost containment. Local expert opinion or judgment was rated as the most important influence in the development of clinical guidelines, followed by medical and scientific literature and externally developed guidelines. Feedback of information was the most popular method of increasing compliance with clinical guidelines, although 19% of physician organizations reported imposing sanctions on physicians who did not use guidelines. Most of the physician organizations surveyed have embraced clinical guidelines. Local development or adaptation of clinical guidelines may be common. There has been disproportionately little attention paid to guideline implementation and to evaluation of guideline effects relative to their development.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine and Department of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Classifying the Effectiveness of Veterans Affairs Guideline Implementation Approaches
BootsMiller et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2004;19:248-254.
ABSTRACT  

Sustaining the Implementation of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Bronchiolitis
Perlstein et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:1001-1007.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Future of Psychosocial Treatments for Elderly Patients
Klausner and Alexopoulos
Psychiatr. Serv. 1999;50:1198-1204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Disease Management
Ellrodt et al.
JAMA 1997;278:1687-1692.
ABSTRACT  

Whose Guideline Is It, Anyway?
Saver
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:532-534.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.