 |
|
Primary Care Physicians' Practice Patterns and Diabetic RetinopathyCurrent Levels of Care
Stephanie Kakos Kraft, MPH;
David G. Marrero, PhD;
Emmanuel N. Lazaridis, PhD;
Naomi Fineberg, PhD;
Chunfu Qiu, PhD;
Charles M. Clark, Jr, MD
Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(1):29-37.
Abstract
| |
Background
Diabetic retinopathy is a costly and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus.
Objective
To assess primary care physicians' self-reported practice patterns for the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy relative to published guidelines.
Participants and Methods
All primary care physicians (defined as general internists, family practitioners, and general practitioners) in Indiana were identified and surveyed using a mailed questionnaire. Of 2390 physicians, 1508 (63%) responded and were determined to be eligible. Of these 1508 physicians, 1058 (70%) completed all or some of the eye care—related questions. For each eye care practice, physicians were asked to specify the proportion of patients to which the practice was applied and the frequency (eg, every 3 months) with which the behavior was performed, if appropriate. Physicians were also asked to distinguish between patients with type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non—insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus for each practice behavior.
Results
Physicians' responses were classified as "high," "moderate," or "low" based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Forty-five percent of the physicians' responses were classified as high for referring all of their patients with type I diabetes mellitus to an eye care specialist annually as were 35% of the physicians' responses for referring their patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Fewer physicians reported high levels of routine in-office funduscopic examination. No relationship was found between the extent to which physicians performed an inoffice funduscopic examination and patterns of referral to eye care specialists. Logistic regression analysis suggested that recent graduates and general internists are most likely to report behavior that is considered high (P<.05).
Conclusion
The diabetic retinopathy—related practice patterns of primary care physicians in Indiana differ significantly from published guidelines.
Author Affiliations
From the Diabetes Research and Training Center (Ms Kraft and Drs Marrero, Qiu, and Clark), Division of Biostatistics (Drs Lazaridis and Fineberg), and The Regenstrief Institute for Health Care (Drs Qiu and Clark), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
The Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy Among Adults in the United States
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:552-563.
Diabetes Care Processes and Outcomes in Patients Treated by Nurse Practitioners or Physicians
Lenz et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2002;28:590-598.
ABSTRACT
Incorporating the Results of Diabetes Research Into Clinical Practice: Celebrating 25 years of Diabetes Research and Training Center translation research
Clark et al.
Diabetes Care 2001;24:2134-2142.
FULL TEXT
Quality of Life: Erosions and Opportunities Under Managed Care
Morreim
J Law Med Ethics 2000;28:144-158.
Factors Associated With Implementation of Preventive Care Measures in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Streja and Rabkin
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:294-302.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Interview Strategies Commonly Used by Pediatricians
Mendelsohn et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:154-157.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medical Information on the Internet
Hubbs et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1363-1363.
FULL TEXT
Management of Patients With HIV/AIDS: Who Should Care?
Lewis
JAMA 1997;278:1133-1134.
ABSTRACT
Preventive Health Care for Diabetics: A Realistic Vision
Wender
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:38-41.
ABSTRACT
|
