JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 6 No. 1, January 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BRIEF REPORT
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Preferences of Husbands and Wives for Prostate Cancer Screening

Robert J. Volk, PhD; Scott B. Cantor, PhD; Stephen J. Spann, MD; Alvah R. Cass, MD, ScM; Melchor P. Cardenas, MD, MPH; Michael M. Warren, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(1):72-76.


Abstract

The benefits of screening for prostate cancer are uncertain. Outcomes of treatment are particularly important to couples because they challenge the most intimate aspects of a couple's relationship. This study used clinical decision analysis to explore the preferences of 10 couples for prostate cancer screening. The decision-analytic model found that 7 of 10 husbands preferred the no screening strategy, while 9 of 10 wives preferred screening for their husbands. Wives associated little burden with complications of treatment, preferring to maximize their husbands' quantity of life regardless of complications. The issue of who is the decision maker is paramount in the case of prostate cancer sreening. Optimal screening strategies may differ for husbands and wives. Guidelines for prostate cancer screening and management should consider assessing preferences on an individual couple basis.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Family Medicine (Drs Volk, Spann, Cass, and Cardenas) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (Dr Warren), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; and the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Specialties, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Cantor).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utilities
Bremner et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:288-298.
ABSTRACT  

Theory about Heuristic Strategies Based on Verbal Protocol Analysis: The Emperor Needs a Shave
Hamm
Med Decis Making 2004;24:681-686.
ABSTRACT  

Health-Related Quality of Life, Satisfaction, and Economic Outcome Measures in Studies of Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment, 1990-2000
McNaughton-Collins et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004;2004:78-101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communicating Evidence for Participatory Decision Making
Epstein et al.
JAMA 2004;291:2359-2366.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short-Term Impact of Cancer Prevention and Screening Activities on Quality of Life
Cullen et al.
JCO 2004;22:943-952.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Older Men Benefit From Curative Therapy of Localized Prostate Cancer?
Alibhai et al.
JCO 2003;21:3318-3327.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Second-hand prostatism: effects of prostatic symptoms on spouses' quality of life, daily routines and family relationships
Shvartzman et al.
Fam Pract 2001;18:610-613.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Sildenafil
Beaird
ANN INTERN MED 2001;134:249-249.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Sildenafil
Groeneveld and Duncan
ANN INTERN MED 2001;134:249-250.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Sildenafil
Smith and Roberts
ANN INTERN MED 2001;134:250-251.
FULL TEXT  

The Cost-Effectiveness of Sildenafil
Smith and Roberts
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:933-937.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biopsychosocial Aspects of Prostate Cancer
Kunkel et al.
Psychosomatics 2000;41:85-94.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening
Volk et al.
Arch Fam Med 1999;8:333-340.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Family Medicine
Bowman and Nicklin
JAMA 1997;277:1857-1858.
 

PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: IT DEPENDS ON YOUR PERSPECTIVE
JWatch General 1997;1997:7-7.
FULL TEXT  

Whose Life Is It Anyway?
Konen
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:77-78.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.