JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 6 No. 3, May 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Efficacy of Diclofenac in Lateral Epicondylitis of the Elbow Also Treated With Immobilization

Hubert Labelle, MD; Rémi Guibert, MD, MSc

Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(3):257-262.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of an oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

Design
Multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial in which the following hypothesis was tested: whether diclofenac sodium provided a 20% or greater improvement over rest and cast immobilization in the response rate to treatment of lateral epicondylitis beyond and over rest in an experimental group compared with a control group after 4 weeks of treatment.

Setting
Recruitment from urban general practices and referrals to 4 university hospitals.

Subjects and Methods
During a 1-year period, 206 subjects aged 18 to 60 years with lateral epicondylitis were recruited from the clientele treated by family physicians. Thirty subjects refused to participate and 47 presented with exclusion criteria, leaving 129 subjects who entered the study. One subject withdrew after 21 days.

Interventions
The experimental group was treated with a daily dose of diclofenac sodium (150 mg) for 28 days, while the control group received a placebo during the same period. In addition, both groups were immobilized in a cast for 14 days and were told not to perform repetitive movements of the involved limb for 21 days.

Main Outcome Measures
Measuring instruments consisted of grip strength measurements with a squeeze dynamometer, a visual analog pain scale, a visual analog function scale, and an 8-item pain-free function index.

Results
A statistically and clinically significant reduction of pain was associated with treatment with diclofenac, but no clinically significant difference in grip strength or functional improvement could be detected between the 2 groups. Secondary effects (diarrhea and abdominal pain) were significantly more frequent in the diclofenac-treated group.

Conclusion
Taking into account the limited improvement noted over rest and cast immobilization and the number of associated adverse events, it is difficult to recommend the use of diclofenac in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis at the dosage used in this study.



Author Affiliations

for the University of Montreal Orthopaedic Research Group

From the Division of Orthopaedics, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal (Dr Labelle) and the Department of Family Medicine, McGill University (Dr Guibert), Montreal, Quebec. A complete list of the members of the University of Montreal Orthopaedic Research Group appears on page 262.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Management of Lateral Epicondylitis: Current Concepts
Calfee et al.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:19-29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia * Commentary
Bisset et al.
Br. J. Sports. Med. 2005;39:411-422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Conservative Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: Brace Versus Physical Therapy or a Combination of Both--A Randomized Clinical Trial
Struijs et al.
Am J Sports Med 2004;32:462-469.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injection and naproxen for treatment of lateral epicondylitis of elbow in primary care
Hay et al.
BMJ 1999;319:964-968.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Looking Back in the Medicine Cabinet...
Browning
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:263-264.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.