JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 6 No. 5, September 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Determinants of Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Use in Prostate Cancer Screening by Primary Care Physicians

Orson J. Austin, MD; Suzanne Valente, MD, MPH; Lora A. Hasse, PhD; John R. Kues, PhD

Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(5):453-458.


Abstract

Objective
To identify determinants of prostatespecific antigen (PSA) test use in prostate cancer screening by primary care physicians.

Design
Self-administered, confidential surveys were mailed to 800 Ohio primary care physicians. A second mailing to nonrespondents was sent a month later. Surveys included questions on beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and reasons for PSA prostate cancer screening.

Results
The response rate of usable surveys was 51% (n=408). More than half (55%) of the respondents reported using the PSA test for screening often or always. Multiple regression analysis showed physicians' reported belief that PSA screening is the standard of care in one's community was the strongest direct predictor of use (β=.32; P<.001). Other direct predictors of PSA test use included physician feeling about the test (β=.28; P<.001), patient requests for the test (β=.19; P<.001), age of patient (β=.11; P<=.003), and recommendation of specialty or other organizations (β=.12; P=.001).

Conclusions
Although PSA prostate cancer screening has yet to be proved definitely effective in decreasing mortality or morbidity from the disease, more than half of Ohio primary care physicians surveyed reported regular screening. The rationale for such screening seems to be multifaceted, and, thus, changes in physician behavior probably will be difficult to achieve.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing among the Elderly in Community-Based Family Medicine Practices
Hudson et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:257-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Guidelines on Primary Care Physician Use of PSA Screening: Results from the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey
Guerra et al.
Med Decis Making 2008;28:681-689.
ABSTRACT  

Does 'peer coaching' increase GP capacity to promote informed decision making about PSA screening? A cluster randomised trial
Gattellari et al.
Fam Pract 2005;22:253-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Prevention in Patients With Coronary or Peripheral Arterial Disease
McDermott et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2157-2162.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why do Primary Care Physicians in the United States and France Order Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests for Asymptomatic Patients?
Sorum et al.
Med Decis Making 2003;23:301-313.
ABSTRACT  

GP and patient predictors of PSA screening in Australian general practice
Gattellari et al.
Fam Pract 2003;20:294-303.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation: Comparisons With Mammography and Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
Lemon et al.
AJPH 2001;91:1264-1272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.