JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 7 No. 2, March 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Brief Report
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Telemedicine
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Field Trial of 2 Telemedicine Camera Systems in a Family Practice

William J. Crump, MD; Ravi Kumar, MD; Glenn Orsak, MD; Thom Pfeil, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:174-176.

Previous reports of telemedicine consultations have demonstrated that the technology is effective but inefficient. Little attention has been directed to the use of telemedicine in a primary care practice, especially the use of the medical peripheral devices. We used a functioning primary care practice as a telemedicine test bed, providing unselected patients in the study group. The goal was to study the performance of a new generation of a compact set of medical peripheral devices specifically designed for telemedicine examinations. In a 3-week field trial, 2 second-generation camera systems were used by physician faculty and residents in family practice to examine the skin, ears, and pharynx of 34 patients, ranging in age from 10 months to 78 years. Evaluations by the clinicians and patients were obtained. The average duration of an examination using these systems was 2 minutes. Patients' response was uniformly positive. A "pistol grip" video otoscope obtained an acceptable image, unless canal debris obscured the view. The system that provided pneumatic otoscopy was preferred, with some modifications necessary to obtain an airtight seal. The preferred skin camera was one that provided an image of a size that clinicians were most accustomed to viewing, although stability of this handheld camera was a problem. This camera also worked well to visualize the pharynx, especially in children with symptoms of pharyngitis. Color was deemed important in all 3 anatomical areas, and using auto-white balance and excluding fluorescent lights were preferred. Thus, the second-generation telemedicine peripheral devices were effective for use in a group of unselected primary care patients. These camera systems can be used by nursing personnel and require a minimum of time per examination.


From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. Dr Kumar is now with Lakewood Clinic, Staples Minn; Dr Orsak, Friendswood Family Physicians, Friendswood, Tex; and Dr Pfeil, Family HealthCare Centers, Galveston.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Telehealth for Children with Special Health Care Needs: Promoting Comprehensive Systems of Care
Farmer and Muhlenbruck
CLIN PEDIATR 2001;40:93-98.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG