JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 7 No. 4, July 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (65)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Acceptability and Feasibility of Early Pregnancy Termination by Mifepristone-Misoprostol

Results of a Large Multicenter Trial in the United States

Beverly Winikoff, MD; Charlotte Ellertson, PhD; Batya Elul, MSc; Irving Sivin, MA; for the Mifepristone Clinical Trials Group

Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:360-366.

Objectives  To evaluate whether the regimen of oral mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion is acceptable to women and providers, in the United States, including physicians, nurses, and counselors, and whether proposed modifications of this regimen appear feasible for clinical practice.

Design  A prospective study.

Setting  Seventeen clinics in 15 states.

Participants  A total of 2121 women with pregnancies of 63 days or less in duration.

Interventions  The administration of mifepristone, 600 mg, orally, followed after 2 days by the administration of misoprostol, 400 µg, orally. Clinical observation for 4 hours followed misoprostol administration. Two weeks later, at a checkup, women were questioned about the abortion experience. Providers also answered questions about acceptability and feasibility.

Main Outcome Measures  Patient reports of overall satisfaction with the abortion, the number of women who would choose medical abortion again if needed or recommend the method to others, the best and worst features of the method, and provider and patient assessments of home use.

Results  The regimen was highly acceptable. Nearly all women (95.7%) would recommend it to others, 91.2% would choose it again, and 87.6% found it very or moderately satisfactory. Even among women for whom the method failed, 69.6% would try it again, 84.9% would recommend it to others, and 51.9% found it very or moderately satisfactory. The chance to avoid a surgical procedure was reported as the method's best feature. The most commonly cited worst features were the uncertainty and fear of side effects. Providers and women considered home use feasible and safe.

Conclusions  American women found abortion with the use of mifepristone and misoprostol acceptable. Even most with unsuccessful outcomes would select the regimen again and recommend it to others. Most providers and women thought that home use of misoprostol should be available for women who prefer it.


From the Population Council, New York, NY. A complete list of the members of the Mifepristone Clinical Trials Group appears at the end of this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study
Rorbye et al.
Hum Reprod 2005;20:834-838.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Abortion in Family Practice: A Case Series
Prine et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16:290-295.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Providers, Pills and Power: The US Mifepristone Abortion Trials and Caregivers' Interpretations of Clinical Power Dynamics
Simonds et al.
Health (London) 2001;5:207-231.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG