JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 8 No. 5, September 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Cervical Cancer
 •Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Characteristics and Quality of Papanicolaou Smears Obtained by Primary Care Clinicians Using a Single Commercial Laboratory

Peter Curtis, MD; Melanie Mintzer, MD; Daphne Morrell, MSPH; Jacqueline C. Resnick, BS; Selinde Hendrix, BA; Bahjat F. Qaqish, PhD

Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:407-413.

Background  Few data are available on factors associated with the quality of Papanicolaou smears performed in primary care.

Objective  To identify the patterns and proficiency of cervical cancer screening among different primary care specialties.

Materials and Methods  Clinical and cytologic data from 21,833 Papanicolaou smears, submitted to a single large commercial laboratory by 176 clinicians during a 7-month period, were correlated with individual clinician and specialty characteristics according to indexes of specimen quality.

Results  Obstetrician-gynecologists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants provided screening to a younger population of women compared with family physicians, internists, and general practitioners. Factors positively associated with a greater probability of a "satisfactory" smear or the presence of endocervical cells (as a marker of adequate sampling) were increasing patient age, use of the cytobrush, and the specialty of the obstetrician-gynecologist. Satisfactory smears were not associated with any increased identification of cytologic abnormalities compared with "limited" smears. In contrast, smears with endocervical cells showed a higher proportion of abnormalities compared with specimens without such cells.

Conclusions  Differences in the performance of obtaining Papanicolaou smears exist between primary care specialties, but need further clarification. The use of the cytobrush and the presence of endocervical cells are criteria that reflect clinician proficiency more realistically than the laboratory criterion of satisfactory smear.


From the Department of Family Medicine (Drs Curtis and Mintzer); the Departments of Maternal and Child Health (Mss Morrell and Hendrix) and Biostatistics (Dr Qaqish), School of Public Health; and the Office of the Vice Provost for Graduate Studies and Research (Ms Resnick), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


RELATED ARTICLES

The Archives of Family Medicine Continuing Medical Education Program
Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(5):383-385.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Papanicolaou Smears
Marjorie A. Bowman
Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(5):413.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.