 |
|
A Survey of Primary Care Physician Practice Patterns and Adherence to Acute Low Back Problem Guidelines
Daniel Di Iorio, MD, DC;
Eric Henley, MD, MPH;
Andrea Doughty, PhD
Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1015-1021.
Objective This study evaluated physicians' self-reported management of acute low back problems in adults and adherence with published guidelines.
Design Self-administered written survey based on the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) guideline on acute low back problems in adults.
Setting A region of northern Illinois with a population around 250 000 and encompassing a medium-sized city.
Participants One hundred eighty-two primary care physicians (nonpediatric) with medical staff appointments at area hospitals.
Main Outcome Measure Adherence to published recommendations.
Results Eighty-seven surveys were received for a 48% response rate. Overall, survey respondents recognized 5 of 7 red flags representing serious underlying abnormality 50% or less of the time. Forty percent (35/87) of physicians provided patients with written educational material, and only 25%(22/87) indicated they evaluated motor function of the fifth lumbar nerve, the most commonly affected level in intervertebral disk disease disease. About 25% (24/87) reported routine use of plain films; and 16% (14/87), routine use of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Most oral medication use was consistent with recommendations, but many also used drugs conditionally discouraged by the guideline (muscle relaxants, 91% [79/87]; opioids, 62% [54/87]) or cautioned against (oral steroids, 45% [39/87]; antidepressants, 23% [20/87]; injection therapy, 52% [45/87]). Only 22% (19/87) of respondents used or recommended manipulation.
Conclusions The management of patients with acute low back problems by primary care physicians differs significantly from Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline recommendations in several key areas that include awareness of red flags, use of medication, use of radiographic studies, the need for patient education, and the use of physical modalities. Future research should focus on the impact of guideline compliance on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline
Chou and Huffman
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:492-504.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medications for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline
Chou and Huffman
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:505-514.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening for Proteinuria in US Adults: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Boulware et al.
JAMA 2003;290:3101-3114.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effect of Antidepressant Treatment on Chronic Back Pain: A Meta-analysis
Salerno et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:19-24.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
