JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 8 No. 4, July 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Reminders for Health Maintenance Visits

Does some form of reminder increase the likelihood that a patient will go to their scheduled health maintenance appointment and/or their appointment for 1 or more preventive services such as immunization or cancer screening?


The most common appointment reminders are mailed notices and telephone calls.1 Studies have shown that computer-generated telephone calls increased visits substantially for routine checkups at public health clinics2 and childhood immunization visits.3 A regular telephone call 1 day prior to a scheduled visit increased attendance by 15% in an adolescent clinic.4 Similarly, mailed reminders for breast and/or cervical cancer screening have been shown to have anywhere from no effect to as much as a 50% greater likelihood of obtaining the recommended screening.5-9 One study compared patient-specific letter reminders with postcards and found no notable difference between them. However, both mailed reminders resulted in significantly higher attendance at well-child examinations than the group receiving no reminders.10 Alternatively, 2 studies to improve adult immunization have shown that adding a targeted educational message significantly increased the effect of the mailed appointment reminder.11-12 One study that examined the effect alone and in combination with automated telephone messages and letter reminders found that a letter followed by a telephone message was significantly better than either alone and resulted in 58% of underimmunized children getting an immunization compared with 36% of a comparison group receiving no reminders.13

In conclusion, reminders, whether by mail or telephone, have a modest effect on increasing health maintenance visits and the provision of preventive services.

Stuart J. Cohen, EdD; William P. Moran, MD, MS; James L. Wofford, MD, MS; John S. Preisser, PhD
Winston-Salem, NC

1. Cohen SJ, Moran WP, Wofford JL, Prisser JS. Physician and patient predictors of health maintenance vistis. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:346-351. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Dini EF, Linkins RW, Chaney M. Effectiveness of computer-generated telephone messages in increasing clinic visits. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:902-905. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Linkins RW, Dini EF, Watson G, Patriarca PA. A randomized trial of the effectiveness of computer-generated telephone messages in increasing immunization visits among preschool children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;148:908-914. FREE FULL TEXT
4. O'Brien G, Lazebnik R. Telephone call reminders and attendance in an adolescent clinic. Pediatrics. 1998;101:E6.
5. Burack RC, Gmotty PA, McBride GJ, et al. How reminders given to patients and physician affected Pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 1998;82:2391-2400. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
6. O'Connor AM, Griffiths CJ, Underwood MR, Eldridge S. Can postal prompts from general practitioners improve the uptake of breast screening? a randomized controlled trial in one east London general practice. J Med Screen. 1998;5:49-52. FREE FULL TEXT
7. Margolis KL, Menart TC. A test of two interventions to improve compliance with scheduled mammography appointments. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:539-541. ISI | PUBMED
8. Wagner TH. The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:64-70. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
9. Somkin CP, Hiatt RA, Hurley LB, Gruskin E, Ackerson L, Larson P. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1658-1664. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Campbell JR, Szilagyi PG, Rodewald LE, Doane C, Roghmann KJ. Patient-specific reminder letters and pediatric well-child-care show rates. Clin Pediatr. 1994;33:268-272.
11. Carter WB, Beach LR, Inui TS. The flu shot study: using multi-attribute utility theory to design a vaccination intervention. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1986;38:378-391. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
12. Moran WP, Nelson K, Wofford JL, Velez R, Case LD. Increasing influenza immunization among high-risk patients: education or financial incentive? Am J Med. 1996;101:612-620. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
13. Lieu TA, Capra AM, Makol J, Black SB, Shinefield HR. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of letters, automated telephone messages, or both for underimmunized children in a health maintenance organization. Pediatrics. 1998;101:E3.

Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:295-296.






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.