|
|
Error in Text
Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:204.
In the article entitled "Use of the Intrauterine Device by Inner-city Women," published in the March/April issue of the ARCHIVES (1998;7:130-133), the third sentence in the right column of the introduction on page 130, line 8, should read as follows: "The first-year continuation rates for subdermal implants are comparable with those for IUDs7 and are much lower for oral and injectable contraceptives.8"
|