![](/ServeContent?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchfami.ama-assn.org%2Ficons%2Fspacer.gif) |
![](/ServeContent?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchfami.ama-assn.org%2Ficons%2Fspacer.gif) |
![](/ServeContent?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchfami.ama-assn.org%2Ficons%2Fspacer.gif)
Cervical Cancer Screening-Reply
Mack T. Ruffin, MD
Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(11):1114-1115.
References Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.
![](/ServeContent?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchfami.ama-assn.org%2Ficons%2Fspacer.gif) | ![](/ServeContent?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchfami.ama-assn.org%2Ficons%2Fspacer.gif) |
1. Ruffin MT. Cervical cancer screening: issues of collection tools and reporting. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:261-263.
FREE FULL TEXT
2. McCord ML, Stovall TG, Meric JL, Summit RL, Coleman SA. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1772-1779.
PUBMED
3. Hutchinson M, Fertitta I, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian F, Isenstein L. Cervix-Brush and cytobrush: a comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears. J Reprod Med. 1991;36:581-586.
PUBMED
4. Ferris DG, Berrey MN, Ellis KE, Petry LJ, Voxnaes J, Beatie RT. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with a Cervix-Brush. J Fam Pract. 1992;34:276-280.
PUBMED
5. Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology: improvements in smear quality and detection rates. Acta Cytol. 1986;30:264-270.
PUBMED
6. Boon ME, de Graff-Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1988;33:843-848.
7. Davey DD, Nielsen ML, Rosenstock W, Kline TS. Terminology and specimen adequacy in cervicovaginal cytology: the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:903-907.
PUBMED
8. Selvaggi SM. Spatula/cytobrush vs spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:629-633.
PUBMED
9. Gupta JW, Gupta PK, Rosenshein N, Shah KV. Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical smears: a comparison of in situ hybridization, immunocytochemistry and cytopathology. Acta Cytol. 1987;31:387-396.
PUBMED
10. Boras VF, Duggan MA. Cervical dyskeratotic cells as predictors of condylomatous changes on biopsy. Acta Cytol. 1989;33:223-227.
PUBMED
11. Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN, et al. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:958-964.
FREE FULL TEXT
12. Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Boon ME. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears. Acta Cytol. 1988;32:801-804.
PUBMED
13. Gottlieb SS. The use of antiarrhythmic agents in heart failure: implications of CAST. Am Heart J. 1989;118:1074-1077.
PUBMED
14. Reiffel JA, Cook JT. Physician attitudes toward the use of type IC antiarrhythmics after the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:1262-1264.
PUBMED
15. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) investigators. Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:406-412.
ABSTRACT
16. Ruskin JN. The cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST). N Engl J Med. 1989;321:386-388.
PUBMED
|