Arch Fam Med
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 2, February 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Clinical Follow-up of Cervical Sampling With the Ayre Spatula and Zelsmyr Cytobrush

Byron J. Crouse, MD; Barbara A. Elliott, PhD; Noah Nesin, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(2):145-148.

Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.

1. Papanicolaou GN. New cancer diagnosis. In: Proceedings Third Race Betterment Conference. Battle Creek, Mich: Race Betterment Foundation; 1928:528-534.
2. Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF. The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1941;43:193-206.
3. Ayre JE. Selective cytologic smear for the diagnosis of cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1947;53:609-619.
4. Richart RM, Vaillant HW. Influence of cell collection techniques upon cytological diagnosis. Cancer. 1965;18:1474-1478. PUBMED
5. Bangle R, Berger M, Levin M. Variation in the morphogenesis of squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 1963;16:1151-1159. PUBMED
6. Boyd JT, Doll R. A study of the aetiology of carcinoma of the cervix uteri. BrJ Cancer. 1964;3:419-434.
7. Gondos B, Marshall D, Ostergard DR. Endocervical cells in cervical smears. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;114:833-834. PUBMED
8. Elias A, Linthorst G, Bekker B, Vooijs PG. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes. Acta Cytol. 1983;27:225-229. PUBMED
9. Vooijs PG, Elias A, Vander Gaaf Y, Veling S. Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1985;29:323-328. PUBMED
10. Deckert JJ, Staten SF, Palmero V. Improved endocervical cell yield with cytobrush. J Fam Pract. 1988;26:639-641. PUBMED
11. Reissman SE. Comparison of two Papanicolaou smear techniques in a family practice setting. J Fam Pract. 1988;26:525-530. PUBMED
12. Colon VF, Linz LE. The extended tip spatula for cervical cytology. J Fam Pract. 1981;13:37-41. PUBMED
13. Noel ML. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989;2:156-160. PUBMED
14. Nelson JH, Averette HE, Richart RM. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (dysplasia and carcinoma in situ) and early invasive cervical carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 1989;39:157-178. FREE FULL TEXT
15. Crump WJ. Current use of the Papanicolaou smear. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1988;1:131-134. PUBMED
16. Jones DED, Creasman WT, Dombroski RA, Lentz SS, Waeltz JL. Evaluation of the atypical Pap smear. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:544-549. PUBMED
17. Taylor PT. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:734-737. PUBMED
18. Davis JR, Hindman WM, Paplanus SH, Trego DC, Wiens JL, Suciu TN. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology. Acta Cytol. 19981;25:533-538.
19. Beilby JOW, Bourne R, Guillebaud J, Steele ST. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60:46-48. PUBMED
20. Luthy DA, Briggs RM, Buyco A, Eschenbach DA. Cervical cytology: increased sensitivity with a second cervical smear. Obstet Gynecol. 1978;51:713-717. PUBMED
21. Champion MJ, Cuzick J, McCance DJ, Singer J. Progressive potential of mild cervical atypia: prospective cytological, colposcopic, and virological study. Lancet. 1986;2:237-240. PUBMED
22. Richart RM, Banon BA. A follow-up study of patients with cervical dysplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;105:386-393. PUBMED
23. Hulka BS. Cytologic and histologic outcome following an atypical cervical smear. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;101:190-199. PUBMED
24. Montz FJ, Monk BJ, Fowler JM, Nguyen L. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:385-388. PUBMED
25. Eddy DM. Screening for cervical cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1900;113:214-226.
26. Koss LG. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection: a triumph and a tragedy. JAMA. 1989;261:737-743. FREE FULL TEXT
27. Van Der Graaf Y, Vooijs GP. False-negative rate in cervical cytology. J Clin Pathol. 1987;40:438-442. FREE FULL TEXT
28. Richart RM. Causes and management of cervical interepithelial neoplasia. Cancer. 1087;60:1951-1959.
29. Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJM, Rietveld-Scheffers PEM. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Acta Cytol. 1986;30:264-270. PUBMED
30. Alons-van Kordelaar JJM, Boon ME. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears. Acta Cytol. 1988;32:801-804. PUBMED