 |
|
How Representative of Typical Practice Are Practice-Based Research Networks?A Report From the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network Inc (ASPN)
Larry A. Green, MD;
Rebecca S. Miller, MS;
Frank M. Reed, MD;
Donald C. Iverson, PhD;
Gwyn E. Barley, MPl
Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(9):939-949.
References
Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.
| |
1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Final Report of the Task Force on Increasing Capacity for Research in Primary Care. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1992.
2. Council on Graduate Medical Education. Improving Access to Health Care Through Physician Manpower Reform: Directions for the 21st Century: Third Report of COGME. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration; 1992. 3. Norton PG, Stewart M, Tudiver F, Bass MJ, Dunn EV. Primary Care Research: Traditional and Innovative Approaches. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1991:xi-xiii. 4. Starfield B. Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1992. 5. White KL. The Task of Medicine: Dialogue at Wickenburg. Menlo Park, Calif: Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation; 1988. 6. Stewart M, Tudiver F, Bass MJ, Dunn EV, Norton PG. Tools for Primary Care Research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1992. 7. Aiken LH, Lewis CE, Craig J, Mendenhall RC, Blendon RJ, Rogers DE. The contribution of specialists to the delivery of primary care: a new perspective. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1363-1370.
ABSTRACT
8. McWhinney IR. General practice as an academic discipline: reflections after a visit to the United States. Lancet. 1966;209:419-423.
9. Lamberts H, Wood M. ICPC: International Classification of Primary Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1990. 10. Lamberts H, Brouwer HJ, Mohrs J. Reason for Encounter-, Episode-, and Process-Oriented Standard Output From the Transition Project. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam; 1991. 11. Headache Study Group at the University of Western Ontario. Predictors of outcome in headache patients presenting to family physicians: a one year prospective study. Headache. 1986;26:285-294.
PUBMED
12. Dietrich AJ, Nelson EC, Kirk JW, Zubkoff M, O'Connor GT. Do primary care physicians actually manage their patients' fee-for-service care? JAMA. 1988;259:3145-3149.
FREE FULL TEXT
13. Nelson EC, Kirk JW, Bise BW, et al. The cooperative information project, part I: a sentinel practice network for service and research in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1981:13:641-649.
PUBMED
14. Nelson EC, Kirk JW, Bise BW, et al. The cooperative information project, II: some initial clinical, quality assurance, and practice management studies. J Fam Pract. 1981;13:867-876.
PUBMED
15. Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Zubkoff M, et al. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care: results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA. 1992;267:1624-1630.
FREE FULL TEXT
16. Dietrich AJ, Goldberg H. Preventive content of adult primary care: do generalists and subspecialists differ? Am J Public Health. 1984;74:223-227.
FREE FULL TEXT
17. Franks P, Eisinger S. Adverse perinatal outcomes: is physician specialty a risk factor? J Fam Pract. 1987;24:152-156.
PUBMED
18. Spiegel JS, Rubenstein LV, Scott B, Brook RH. Who is the primary physician? N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1208-1212.
ABSTRACT
19. Franks P, Clancy CM, Nutting PA. Gatekeeping revisited: protecting patients from overtreatment. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:424-429.
PUBMED
20. Marsland DW, Wood M, Mayo F. A data bank for patient care, curriculum, and research in family practice: 526,196 patient problems. J Fam Pract. 1976;3:23-28, 37-68.
PUBMED
21. Rosenblatt RA, Cherkin CS, Schneeweiss R, Hart LG. The content of ambulatory medical care in the United States: an interspecialty comparison. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:892-897.
ABSTRACT
22. Klein M. Do women under the care of family physicians have fewer cesarean sections? Fam Pract Res J. 1992;12:225-230.
PUBMED
23. Wennberg JE, Burkes JP, Barnes BA. The need for assessing the outcome of common medical practices. Ann Rev Public Health. 1980;1:277-295.
PUBMED
24. Ramsey CN Jr, ed. Family Systems in Medicine. New York, NY: Buildford Press; 1988. 25. Stott NCH, Pill RM. Making Changes: A Study of Working Class Mothers and the Changes Made in Their Health-Related Behavior Over 5 Years. Cardiff, Wales: University of Wales College of Medicine; 1990. 26. Green LA, Becker LA, Freeman WL, Elliott E, Iverson DC, Reed FM. Spontaneous abortion in primary care: a report from ASPN. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1988;1:15-23.
PUBMED
27. Becker LA, Iverson DC, Reed FM, Calonge BN, Miller RS, Freeman WL. A study of headache in North American primary care: a report from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. J R Coll Gen Practitioner. 1987;37:400-403.
28. Freeman WL, Green LA, Becker LA. Pelvic inflammatory disease in primary care: a report from ASPN. Fam Med. 1988;20:192-196.
PUBMED
29. Rosser WW, Henderson R, Wood M, Green LA. An exploratory report of chest pain in primary care: a report from ASPN. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1990;3:143-150.
PUBMED
30. Shepherd J, Lutz LJ, Miller RS, Main D. Patients presenting to family physicians after a fall: a report from ASPN. J Fam Pract. 1992;35:43-48.
PUBMED
31. Froom J, Culpepper L, Grob P, et al. Diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media: a report from the International Primary Care Network. BMJ. 1990;300:582-586.
FREE FULL TEXT
32. White KL, Williams TF, Greenberg BG. The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1961;265:885-892.
PUBMED
33. Thacker SB, Greene SB, Salber EJ. Hospitalizations in a southern rural community: an application of the 'ecology model. Int J Epidemiol. 1977;6:55-63.
FREE FULL TEXT
34. Mackenzie J. The opportunities of the general practitioner are essential for the investigation of disease and the progress of medicine. BMJ. 1921;1:797-804.
FREE FULL TEXT
35. Pemberton J. Nill Pickles of Wensleydale: The Life of a Country Doctor. 2nd ed. Exeter, England: Exeter Office of the Royal College of General Practitioners; 1984. 36. Mair A. Sir James Mackenzie MD, 1853-1925: General Practitioner. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 1973. 37. Hames CG. Evans County cardiovascular and cerebrovascular epidemiologic study. Arch Intern Med. 1971;128:883-886.
FREE FULL TEXT
38. Fry J. Common Diseases: Their Nature, Incidence, and Care 2nd ed. Lancaster, England: MTP Press Ltd, Falcon House; 1979. 39. Netherlands Institute of Primary Care (NIVEL). The Dutch Sentinel Practice Network: Relevance for Public Health Policy: Studies From the Continuous Morbidity Registration Sentinel Stations. Utrecht, the Netherlands: the Netherlands Institute of Primary Health Care; 1989. 40. Continuing of the observations and recording of morbidity: Research Committee of the College of General Practioners. J Coll Gen Pract. 1958;1:107-128.
41. Culpepper L, Froom J. The International Primary Care Network: purpose, methods, and policies: a report from ASPN. Fam Med. 1988;20:197-201.
PUBMED
42. van Casteren V, Leurquin P. Eurosentinel: development of an international sentinel network of general practitioners. Methods Inf Med. 1992;31:147-152.
PUBMED
43. Green LA, Lutz LJ. Notions about networks: primary care practices in pursuit of improved primary care. In: Mayfield J, Grady ML, eds. Primary Care Research: An Agenda for the 90s. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1990:125-132. 44. Hickner J. Practice-based primary care research networks. In: Hibbard H, Nutting PA, Grady ML, eds. Primary Care Research: Theory and Methods. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1991:13-22. 45. Green LA, Calonge BN, Fryer GE, Reed FM. Age/sex registries in primary care research: a report from ASPN. Fam Med. 1988;20:185-188.
PUBMED
46. Holloway RL. Networks and net worth: practice-based data collection in family medicine. J Fam Pract. 1991;33:137-148.
PUBMED
47. Schappert SM. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1989 Summary. Vital Health Stat 13. 1992;No. 110. 48. Schappert SM. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1990 Summary. Vital Health Stat. 1992;No. 213. 49. Green LA, Wood M, Becker LA, et al. The ambulatory sentinel practice network: purpose, methods, and policies. J Fam Pract. 1984;18:275-280.
PUBMED
50. Iverson DC, Calonge BN, Miller RS, Niebauer LJ, Reed FM. The development and management of a primary care research network, 1978-87: a report from ASPN. Fam Med. 1988;20:177-181.
PUBMED
51. Public Health Service and Health Care Financing Administration. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 1980. 52. Schneider D, Appleton L, McLemore T. A reason for visit classification for ambulatory care. Vital Health Stat 2. 1979;No. 78. 53. Food and Drug Administration. National Drug Code Directory, 1982 Edition. Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 1982. 54. Koch H, Campbell W. The collection and processing of drug information: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1980. Vital Health Stat 2. 1982;No. 90. 55. Dayton CM, Schafer WD. Extended tables of t and chi square for Bonferroni tests with unequal error allocation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1973;68:78-83.
56. Green LA, Niebauer LJ, Miller RS, Lutz LJ. An analysis of reasons for discontinuing participation in a practice-based research network. Fam Med. 1991;23:447-449.
PUBMED
57. White KL, Connelly JE, eds. The Medical School's Mission and the Population's Health. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag NY Inc; 1992. 58. Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines; Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990. 59. Wasserman RDC, Croft CA, Brotherton S. Preschool vision screening in pediatric practice: a study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS). network. Pediatrics. 1992;89:834-888.
FREE FULL TEXT
|
