JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 11, November 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Cervical Cancer Screening

Daron G. Ferris, MD
Medical College of Georgia Augusta

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(11):1114.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In the recent editorial by Ruffin,I believe the author is mistaken in his assumption that "no studies have evaluated the newer cervical smear instruments using a clinically relevant end point...." In fact, many excellent studies2-8 have been published that considered detection of cervical abnormalities as an outcome measure. These studies2-7 have demonstrated that cervical cancer screening varies not only with the instrument used but also with the technique for which the instrument is used.8 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.