JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 12, December 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Editor's Note

Marjorie A. Bowman, MD, MPA

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(12):1035.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Thank you to the readers who wrote to us about commercial company interaction with physicians. Levy says it well.

Physicians use multiple sources of information about drugs, which is appropriate. Approved new drugs may be beneficial for multiple reasons. For example, a once-a-day formulation may improve compliance for a specific patient, improving outcomes.

Goldstein and Ives suggest that the Archives of Family Medicine require that commercial companies include the cost of drugs in their advertisements within our pages. This is an interesting idea but impractical for the individual journal as the companies produce the same advertisements to appear in multiple places. Perhaps the FDA would consider the idea for national implementation.

It takes a lot of time to keep up with the new drugs (even the old ones), including the appropriate uses for individual patients. It is also an effort that can substantially benefit our patients and is an inherent part of being a patient advocate. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG