JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 4 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Advanced Practice Nurses: Should They Be Independent?

Nancy Ruppert, RN
Star, NC

Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(8):674.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The editorial by Rudy1 in the January 1995 issue of the ARCHIVES was quite interesting but contained some misleading information. For the benefit of Rudy and ARCHIVES readers, I would like to reply in an attempt to prevent unnecessary animosity between our professions.

The meta-analysis that was cited in reference to time spent with patients (comparing nurse practitioners [NPs] with physicians) was taken from studies that were done several years ago. The realities of current practice and economics have resulted in a significant narrowing of that gap. I will readily admit that updated documentation of this is needed.

Advanced practice nurses who do wish to become independent practitioners are not interested in independently practicing medicine; they are interested in practicing nursing, just as they have been trained to do. Quality health care by a primary care provider does not always require medical acts, but when it does, NPs . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.