The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Mandatory Retirement of Academic Employees
Anwar (Andy) N. Khan
DOI: 10.2190/N82D-EYY9-98WG-UFWH
Abstract
Under the Canadian Constitution, education is a provincial rather than the federal government's responsibility. In the majority of Canadian universities, colleges, and schools, a mandatory retirement age of sixty-five for men and women is stipulated either by by-laws made under, or collective agreements facilitated by, provincial legislation. A majority of the provinces, in their individual rights or human rights acts/codes, while proscribing discrimination on the ground of, inter alia, age, provides an exception in that between certain ages the provisions against age discrimination do not apply.1 One of the consequences is that compulsory retirement is not protected under human rights legislation. One of the principal ways the mandatory retirement of academics and others could be challenged was to use the equality provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, courts lower than the Supreme Court of Canada could not agree whether compulsory retirement at a certain age was, under the equality section of the Charter, discriminatory or not. It was left to the Supreme Court of Canada to decide that important question. This article examines these recent developments.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.