Skip Navigation

Institution: Stanford University Libraries Sign In as Personal Subscriber
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Cited by other online articles
Right arrow Request Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gellis, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gellis, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, W. J.

Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 4:155-165 (2004)
© Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Strengthening Evidence-Based Practice

   Zvi Gellis, PhD
   William J. Reid, DSW

From the School of Social Work, University of Albany, State University of New York.

Contact author: Zvi Gellis, PhD, Assistant Professor, School of Social Welfare, University at Albany, State University of New York, 135 Western Avenue, Richardson Hall, Room 112, Albany, New York 12222. E-mail: gellis{at}albany.edu.

Social work practitioners have historically been viewed as those who use not only scientific orientation for case work but also the results of research studies for clinical decision making. Dominant conceptions of evidence-based practice emphasize the social worker as a user of scientific findings, with only a minor role given to the social worker as a scientifically oriented practitioner. Problems with this emphasis include a limited base of validated interventions for social work practice, overestimations and shortfalls in the effectiveness of such interventions, and unresolved issues in transporting research findings to actual work with clients. Evidence-based practice could be strengthened by broadening the notion of evidence to include data obtained by practitioners in the application of research-supported interventions—data that might indicate, for example, whether the intervention (or one of its modifications) worked or needed to be changed.

KEY WORDS: evidence-based, single-subject methods, empirical practice, empirically supported treatment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
E. J. Mullen
Choosing Outcome Measures in Systematic Reviews: Critical Challenges
Research on Social Work Practice, January 1, 2006; 16(1): 84 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.