Human Patient Simulation in Pharmacology Graduate Education: Bridging the Bench-to-Bedside Gap

Table 3

Student Evaluation of Anesthesia Simulation Session

	n^a	Overall Mean (SD^b)
1. Rate this session overall.^c	17	4.76 (0.44)
2. Rate how well course goals were met.	17	4.75 (0.45)
3. How well did the technology evoke realism to get the points across?	17	4.53 (0.64)
4. Rate the quality/content of the lectures/demonstration.	17	4.94 (0.24)
5. Rate the quality of the debriefings/explanations.	17	4.88 (0.33)
6. I feel comfortable in the simulator setting.^d	5	4.60 (0.55)
7. I learned something from the experience.^d	5	4.80 (0.45)
8. I would like to have more simulation/hands on experiences in my education.^d	5	4.40 (0.55)

↵a The total number of participants for years up to and including 2009. Attendance in individual years was n=3, 5, 4, and 5, respectively, in 2005, 2007, 2008, and 2009.
↵b Standard deviation.
↵c Questions 1–5 based on scale: 5=Excellent 4=Very good 3=Adequate 2=Mediocre 1=Awful.
↵d These responses were elicited in 2009 (n=5). Questions 6–8 based on scale: 5=Strongly agree 4=Agree 3=Neutral 2=Disagree 1=Strongly disagree.