e-Journal

Full Text HTML

Paper
Paper | Regular issue | Vol. 83, No. 9, 2011, pp. 2067-2077
Received, 25th May, 2011, Accepted, 27th June, 2011, Published online, 6th July, 2011.
DOI: 10.3987/COM-11-12267
One-Pot Synthesis of Dihydropyrimidiones via Environmentally Friendly Enzyme-Catalyzed Biginelli Reaction

Wanmei Li, Guobin Zhou, Pengfei Zhang,* Yifeng Lai, and Shifu Xu

Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, College of Material, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China

Abstract
A novel enzyme-catalyzed Biginelli reaction of acetoacetate, aromatic aldehyde and urea (thiourea) was described. Great acceleration of the one-pot multicomponent reaction was observed by the aid of enzymes. Various dihydropyrimidiones were prepared in good yields under the conditions using trypsin from porcine pancreas as the catalyst.

INTRODUCTION
Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are of increasing importance in the fields of organic and medicinal chemistry, for their high atom economy, extensive applications in combinatorial chemistry, and diversity-oriented synthesis.1-6 As one of the most useful multicomponent reactions, the Biginelli reaction, originally described by Biginelli in 1893, offers an efficient route to obtain multifunctionalized 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones (DHPMs) and related heterocyclic compounds.7 These heterocycles exhibit a wide spectrum of biological effects such as antibacterial,8 antiviral,9 anticancer,10 anti-inflammatory,11 and antihypertensive effects.12 The first one-pot cyclocondensation reaction of ethylacetoacetate, benzaldehyde and urea was carried out by simply heating the three components mixture dissolved in ethanol with a catalytic amount of HCl at reflux temperature. However, the product yields are quite low (20–50%). Biginelli reactions with higher yields up to 95% have been achieved by replacing the HCl catalyst to ZnCl2,13 FeCl3,14 BF3,15 ZrCl4,16 InBr3,17 In(OTf)3,18 Ln(OTf)3,19 Cu(OTf)2,20 Sr(OTf)2,21 MgBr2,22 [bmim]BF4-immobilized Cu(II) acetylacetonate,23 [bmim] [FeCl4],24 etc. However, all the above methods displayed some drawbacks, such as environmental pollution, strongly acidic reaction conditions, unsatisfactory yields, toxic catalysts, and complicated operations.
As the increase of environmental consciousness in chemical and medicine industry, efficient, economic, and clean procedures have received increased attention in recent years. Although the development of the application of microwave or ultrasound irradiation
25 and green solvent26 in Biginelli reaction is undergoing, it is also urgent to further develop an efficient, convenient and environmentally friendly method to construct such significant scaffold. Enzymes are efficient and environmentally friendly catalysts in organic and bioorganic synthesis. Besides the natural catalytic ability to catalyze a primary reaction, many enzymes can also catalyze secondary reaction, which is termed ‘catalytic promiscuity’.27,28 For example, lipase can catalyze Michael addition,29 and arylmalonate decarboxylase can catalyze aldol additions.30 Recently, we have report a lipase-catalysed tandem Knoevenagel and esterification reaction, and lipase has higher activity for this “promiscuous” reaction.31
Herein, we report a high efficient one-pot synthesis of dihydropyrimidiones by an enzyme-catalyzed Biginelli reaction using trypsin as catalyst. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of specific enzyme-catalyzed Biginelli reaction (Scheme 1).
32

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Firstly, several common enzymes were screened in our experiments as shown in Table 1 using 2 mmol benzaldehyde 1a, 2.1 mmol of ethyl acetoacetate 2a and 2.1 mmol of urea 3 in 5 mL of anhydrous ethanol. In the absence of enzyme, the reaction led to none detectable adduct in 72 h. In contrast, in the presence of some enzymes the reaction is distinctly accelerated (Table 1). For example, in the presence of porcine pancreatic lipase (PPL), about 10% yield of adduct was detected after 96 h (Entry 2). Lipases AY30 and CAL-B (lipase from Candida antarctica) also showed some catalytic activity in the Biginelli reaction (Entries 3 and 4). Amano lipase M from Mucor javanicus displayed moderate activity for Biginelli reaction in the reaction conditions, and 65% yield of 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones 4a could be isolated (Entry 7). Different amylases exhibit huge difference in catalytic activities in this tested Biginelli reaction. α-Amylase from Bacillus Subtilis or Aspergillus oryzae, and β-amylase from soybean showed no detectable catalytic activity (Entries 8, 9 and 10). However, the product 4a could be obtained with a high yield of 75% if α-amylase from hog pancreas was used as catalyst (Entry 11). Excitingly, pepsin from hog stomach and trypsin from porcine pancreas show significant catalytic activities, and the final yields of the desired product 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones 4a were 85% and 88% respectively, after 72 h reaction in our tests (Entries 12 and 13). If trypsin from porcine pancreas was denatured or deactivated, only trace amount of the desired product 4a was detected. Bovine serum albumin, as a non-catalytic protein, either shew none catalysis in this reaction.

Solvent effect was also carefully investigated in the case of using trypsin from porcine pancreas as catalyst due to its highest catalytic activity. It is found that the Biginelli multicomponent reaction could proceed in most common polar solvents, such as MeOH, EtOH, DMSO, MeCN and DMF (Table 2, Entries 1, 2, 3, 4, 9). Among them, the dihydropyrimidione 4a was obtained with much higher yield when MeOH or EtOH is used as solvent (Table 2, Entries 2, 3). In other solvents including THF, CH2Cl2, chloroform, and cyclohexane, only small amount of product was detected (Table 2, Entries 58). It is also found that water could greatly influence the reaction rate. None of desired product was obtained if the reaction was carried out using H2O as solvent (Table 2, Entry 11). When 1 mL of H2O was added into EtOH solvent, the yield decreased from 88 to 10% (Table 2, Entries 3 and 10).

When 0.2 g of 3A molecular sieve was added into the reaction mixture to further remove the water byproduct formed during the reaction, the yield of 4a product can be increased up to 95% in 72 h (Table 2, Entry 12).
The influence of reaction temperature on the enzymatic Biginelli reaction was also considered. It is found that the yield decreased with the decrease of temperature. The yield was only 8% at 25 °C (Table 2, Entry 13). This is quite reasonable result because most of the enzymes give highest activities at about 35 - 40 °C, which close to the body temperature of most mammals.
With the optimal conditions in hand, we applied this protocol to other substrates and the obtained results are shown in Table 3. In the presence of 20 mg of trypsin from porcine pancreas at 37 °C, most three components condensation reactions reached the equilibrium after 72 h in anhydrous ethanol and could provide expected products in good yields.

The results on the reaction of the different aldehydes revealed that the substituent on the aromatic ring plays a little role in governing the reactivity. A variety of para-substituted aromatic aldehydes, bearing either electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents, afforded high yields of the products. The similar results were obtained when using meso-substituted aromatic aldehydes. Ortho-substituted aldehydes such as 2-chlorobenzaldehyde, needed longer time and gave 82% yield (Entry 13). Heterocyclic aldehydes such as 2-pyridylaldehyde and 2-furylaldehyde worked well and afforded the desired product in 87 and 85% yield, respectively. However, the sterically hindered 2, 6-dimethoxylbenzaldehyde couldn’t afford any desired product even after 96 h under the same conditions.
In addition, thiourea
3b was also tested, satisfactorily, corresponding 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-thiones were obtained with 9093% yields (Entries 1618). Furthermore, methyl acetoacetate also afforded the desired products in high yields (Entries 5, 6, 10, and 17).
It should be pointed out that another advantage of this protocol is the easy recovering of the catalyst, and enzyme could be obtained by straight filtration due to its poor solubility in organic solvent. The enzyme was recovered and reused for four times, the recovered enzyme shows good catalytic activity under the same reaction conditions with 93%, 92%, 92%, and 89% yield respectively (Table 3, Entry 1).
According to these satisfactory results, we so proposed a tentative mechanism for this new process (Scheme 2). The proposed mechanism would start with the accommodation of the carbonyl in the active site. The intermediate
A was formed then the final product was obtained through cyclization and dehydration.


CONCLUSION
In conclusion, here we have reported a novel and environmentally friendly enzyme catalyzed multicomponent Biginelli reaction. The advantages of this method included mild reaction conditions, good yields, simple operation and environmentally friendly procedure.

EXPERIMENTAL
Lipase A from Aspergillus niger, AY from Candida Antarctica, AK from Pseudomonas fluorescens, and M from Mucor javanicus were obtained from Amano Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. All amylases and trypsins were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Analytical grade solvents and commercially available reagents were used without further purification. The Thin layer chromatography (TLC), which was used to monitor the reaction, was carried out over silica gel (GF254), purchased from Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co., Ltd. Melting points were determined on a Büchi B-540 capillary melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at VARAIN–400 or BRUKER AC400 using DMSO-d6 as the solvent with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard at room temperature. Chemical shifts are given in relative to TMS, the coupling constants J are given in Hz.

General procedure for the synthesis of dihydropyrimidiones via enzyme-catalyzed Biginelli reaction (Using Trypsin from porcine pancreas, Table 3):
In 5 mL of anhydrous EtOH, 2 mmol of aromatic aldehyde, 2.1mmol of ethyl acetoacetate, 2.1 mmol of urea or thiourea, 0.4g of 3A molecular sieve, 20 mg of trypsin from porcine pancreas was added successfully, and the mixture was orbitally shaken at 37 °C for the given time (see Table 3) and monitored by TLC. When the reaction completed, additional 10 mL of anhydrous EtOH was added to the mixture and heated to 37 °C. The enzyme catalyst and 3A molecular sieve were isolated by hot filtration, then the filtrate was condensed to half volume and cooled to -5 °C, finally the precipitate was collected to obtain the desired dihydropyrimidiones 4a-4r. All products were known compounds, and were analyzed by IR, 1H NMR and 13C NMR. The spectra data were identical with authentic samples.

CHARACTERISTIC DATA
4a
, Straw yellow solid,33 Mp 201-203 °C. IR (KBr): 3440, 3210, 3102, 2936, 1710, 1655, 1579 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.16 (s, 1 H), 7.75 (s, 1 H), 7.22–7.33 (m, 5 H), 5.13 (s, 1 H), 3.99 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.25 (s, 3 H), 1.06 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ= 165.3, 151.9, 148.3, 144.8, 128.3, 127.2, 126.2, 99.1, 59.1, 54.1, 17.9, 14.2.

4b, White solid,33 Mp 186-188 °C. IR (KBr): 3434, 3228, 3112, 2955, 1695, 1644, 1515 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.13 (s, 1 H), 7.68 (s, 1 H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.75 (s, 1 H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.98 (s, 2 H), 5.07 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.96 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.22 (s, 3 H), 1.10 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.2, 152.1, 148.2, 147.1, 146.2, 138.9, 119.2, 107.9, 106.5, 100.8, 99.2, 59.2, 53.7, 17.7, 14.0.

4c, White solid,33 Mp 203-204 °C. IR (KBr): 3428, 3238, 3104, 2964, 1712, 1654, 1518 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.15 (s, 1 H), 7.67 (s, 1 H), 7.14 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.07 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.96 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.73 (s, 3 H), 2.22 (s, 3 H), 1.08 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.3, 158.3, 152.1, 148.1, 137.1, 127.5, 113.6, 99.6, 59.1, 55.0, 53.2, 17.6, 14.0.

4d, White solid,33 Mp 213-215 °C. IR (KBr): 3423, 3241, 3121, 2970, 1705, 1655, 1477 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.21 (s, 1 H), 7.76 (s, 1 H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 5.13 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.98 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.23 (s, 3 H), 1.07 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.1, 151.9, 148.8, 143.7, 131.7, 128.3, 128.1, 98.8, 59.2, 53.4, 17.7, 14.2.

4e, White solid,33 Mp 203-204 °C. IR (KBr): 3366, 3222, 3113, 2953, 1718, 1641, 1504 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.28 (s, 1 H), 7.81 (s, 1 H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.13 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.54 (s, 3 H), 2.26 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.5, 151.8, 148.8, 143.5, 131.7, 128.3, 128.1, 98.3, 53.1, 50.7, 17.8.

4f, White solid,33 Mp 235-237 °C. IR (KBr): 3361, 3225, 3111, 2959, 1719, 1638, 1510 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.40 (s, 1 H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.94 (s, 1 H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.26 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.53 (s, 3 H), 2.28 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.5, 151.6, 149.4, 146.6, 127.4, 123.7, 109.1, 97.8, 53.3, 50.8, 17.9.

4g, Straw yellow solid,33 Mp 226-227 °C. IR (KBr): 3412, 3249, 3125, 2974, 1695, 1659, 1508 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.33 (s, 1 H), 9.11 (s, 1 H), 7.62 (s, 1 H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.67 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.03 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.98 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.22 (s, 3 H), 1.07 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.3, 156.5, 152.3, 147.8, 135.4, 127.4, 115.0, 99.7, 59.1, 53.5, 17.8, 14.1.

4h, Straw yellow solid,33 Mp 255-257 °C. IR (KBr): 3417, 3241, 3115, 2986, 1713, 1637, 1520cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.06 (s, 1 H), 7.56 (s, 1 H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.03 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.97 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.84 (s, 6 H), 2.22 (s, 3 H), 1.10 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.6, 152.3, 149.8, 147.6, 132.7, 126.9, 112.2, 100.0, 59.2, 53.4, 17.6, 14.2.

4i, Straw yellow solid,33 Mp 189-190 °C. IR (KBr): 3431, 3231, 3102, 2978, 2931, 1709, 1653, 1598 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 8.32 (s, 1 H), 7.25–7.36 (m, 4 H), 6.94 (s, 1 H), 5.37 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.06 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.38 (s, 3 H), 1.14 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 166.0, 152.5, 149.0, 148.2, 134.5, 131.0, 128.2, 127.4, 125.8, 100.8, 60.2, 55.5, 18.4, 14.4.

4j, White solid,34 Mp 220-221 oC. IR (KBr): 3323, 3180, 1678, 1579, 1474, 1283, 1190, 1112 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 10.30 (s, 1H), 9.61 (br, 1H), 9.46 (s, 1H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H), 5.08 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.57 (s, 3H), 2.28 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 174.6, 166.3, 158.1, 145.5, 145.2, 130.0, 117.3, 115.2, 113.6, 101.1, 54.3, 51.5, 17.7.

4k, Straw yellow solid,33 Mp 185-186 °C. IR (KBr): 3419, 3230, 3111, 2966, 2931, 1708, 1649, 1615, 1587cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.27 (s, 1 H), 7.77 (s, 1 H), 7.22–7.45 (m, 4 H), 5.13 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.95 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.26 (s, 3 H), 1.10 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.1, 151.9, 148.8, 147.6, 130.8, 130.1, 129.2, 125.2, 121.5, 98.7, 59.3, 53.7, 17.9, 14.2.

4l, Straw yellow solid,33 Mp 232-234 °C. IR (KBr): 3530, 3233, 3109, 2978, 2930, 1705, 1651, 1519 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.16 (s, 1 H), 8.96 (s, 1 H), 7.66 (s, 1 H), 6.80 (s, 1 H), 6.76 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.61 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.03 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.96 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 2.21 (s, 3 H), 1.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.3, 152.2, 147.7, 145.6, 135.8, 118.0, 115.2, 110.7, 99.4, 59.1, 55.4, 53.3, 17.6, 14.1.

4m, Straw yellow solid,33 Mp 211-213 °C. IR (KBr): 3368, 3255, 3107, 1698, 1657 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 1.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 3.99 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 5.63 (s, 1H), 5.87 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.20–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.37–7.39 (m, 1H), 7.86 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.9, 156.4, 152.4, 147.2, 140.1, 136.5, 129.4, 128.2, 127.2, 103.1, 58.0, 53.2, 17.9, 15.0.

4n, White solid,33 Mp 203-204 °C. IR (KBr): 3428, 3302, 3109, 2988, 1712, 1654, 1463 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 9.23 (s, 1 H), 7.74 (s, 1 H), 7.54 (s, 1 H), 6.34 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.06 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.22 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.98 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.21 (s, 3 H), 1.11 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 165.1, 156.0, 152.3, 149.2, 142.2, 110.3, 105.2, 96.7, 59.2, 47.6, 17.8, 14.0.

4o, White solid,35 Mp 196-198 oC. IR (KBr): 3420, 3228, 2932, 2863, 1659, 1566, 1487, cm-1 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 9.21 (s, 1H), 8.51 (s, 1H), 7.72-7.74 (m, 2H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.22-7.24 (m, 1H), 5.33 (s, 1H), 4.20 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 1.17 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 167.8, 154.8, 150.4, 147.8, 147.2, 138.1, 125.1, 121.1, 106.8, 62.1, 50.1, 17.2, 14.1.

4p, Straw yellow solid,34 Mp 212-213 oC. IR (KBr): 3323, 3190, 3116, 2983, 1676, 1613, 1572, 1513 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 10.18 (s, 1H), 9.60 (s, 1H), 7.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 6.92 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.11 (s, 1H), 3.99 (q, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 3.73 (s, 3H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 1.11 (t, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ = 174.1, 165.1, 158.6, 144.7, 135.6, 127.5, 113.9, 100.7, 59.3, 55.0, 53.5, 17.1, 14.2.

4q, White solid,34 Mp 157-168 oC. IR (KBr): 3335, 3158, 2931, 2225, 1692, 1536, and 1174 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 10.43 (s, 1H), 9.71 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.21 (d, s = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (s, 3H), 2.23 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 175.1, 165.2, 147.1, 143.5, 132.7, 127.6, 118.2, 112.3, 102.1, 55.5, 51.6, 18.3.

4r, White solid,34 Mp 240-242 oC. IR (KBr): 3327, 3155, 2225, 1536, 1420, 1178, 776 cm-1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 8.68 (s, 1H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.46 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.39 (s, 3H,), 1.20 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,3H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ = 174.6, 164.7, 146.9, 143.4, 132.9, 127.3, 118.1, 112.0, 101.9, 60.7, 55.4, 18.2, 14.0.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to the natural science foundation of China (no. 21076052) and Key SCI-Tech Innovation Team of Zhejiang Province (2010R50017) for financial help.

References

1. S. L. Dax, J. J. McNally, and M. A. Youngman, Curr. Med. Chem., 1999, 6, 255.
2.
R. W. Armstrong, A. P. Combs, P. A. Tempest, S. D. Brown, and T. A. Keating, Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 123. CrossRef
3.
S. E. Denmark and Y. Fan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 7825. CrossRef
4.
D. B. Ramachary and C. F. Barbas, Chem. Eur. J., 2004, 10, 5323. CrossRef
5.
P. G. Cozzi and E. Rivalta, Angew. Chem, Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 3600. CrossRef
6.
D. J. Ramón and M. Yus, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1602. CrossRef
7.
P. Biginelli, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 1893, 23, 360.
8.
T. Matsuda and I. Hirao, Nippon Kagaku Zasshi, 1965, 86, 1195.
9.
E. W. Hurst and R. I. Hull, J. Med. Pharm. Chem., 1961, 3, 215. CrossRef
10.
B. R. P. Kumar, G. Sankar, R. B. N. Baig, and S. Chandrashekaran, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2009, 44, 4192. CrossRef
11.
Y. S. Sadanandam, M. M. Shetty, and P. V. Diwan, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 1992, 27, 87. CrossRef
12.
M. Kurono, M. Hayashi, K. Miura, Y. Isogawa, and K. Sawai, JP 62,267,272, 1987.
13.
Q. Sun, Y. Wang, Z. Ge, T. Cheng, and R. Li, Synthesis, 2004, 1047. CrossRef
14.
J. Lu and H. Ma, Synlett, 2000, 63. CrossRef
15.
E. H. Hu, D. R. Sidler, and U.-H. Dolling, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 3454. CrossRef
16.
C. V. Reddy, M. Mahesh, P. V. K. Raju, T. R. Babu, and V. V. N. Reddy, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 2657. CrossRef
17.
N. Y. Fu, Y. E. Yuan, Z. Cao, S. W. Wang, J. T. Wang, and C. Peppe, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 4801. CrossRef
18.
R.Ghosh, S. Maiti, and A. Chakraborty, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2004, 217, 47. CrossRef
19.
Y. Ma, C. Qian, L. Wang, and M. Yang, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 3864. CrossRef
20.
A. S. Paraskar, G. K. Dewkar, and A. Sudalai, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 3305. CrossRef
21.
W. Su, J. Li, Z. Zheng, and Y. Shen, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 6037. CrossRef
22.
H. Salehi and Q.-X. Guo, Synth. Commun., 2004, 34, 171. CrossRef
23.
S. L. Jain, J. K. Joseph, and B. Sain, Catal. Lett., 2007, 115, 52. CrossRef
24.
X. Chen and Y. Peng, Catal. Lett., 2008, 122, 310. CrossRef
25.
M. Kidwai, S. Saxena, R. Mohan, and R. Venkataramanana, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 1845. CrossRef
26.
P. G. Mandhane, R. S. Joshi, D. R. Nagargoje, and C. H. Gill, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 3138. CrossRef
27.
U. T. Bornscheuer and R. J. Kazlauskas, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 6032. CrossRef
28.
K. Hult and P. Berglund, Trends Biotech., 2007, 25, 231. CrossRef
29.
M. Svedendahl, K. Hult, and P. Berglund, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17988. CrossRef
30.
Y. Terao, K. Miyamoto, and H. Ohta, Chem. Lett., 2007, 36, 420. CrossRef
31.
Y. F. Lai , H. Zheng, S.J. Chai, X. Z. Chen, and P. F. Zhang, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1917. CrossRef
32.
Although bakers’ yeast can catalyzed the synthesis of 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones efficiently, but it is very different from specific enzymes: A. Kumar and R. A. Maurya, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 4569. CrossRef
33.
J. Lu and Y. Bai, Synthesis, 2002, 466. CrossRef
34.
C. Mukhopadhyay and A. Datta, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2010, 47, 136. CrossRef
35.
S. L. Jain, S. Singhal, and B. Sain, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 740. CrossRef

PDF (677KB) PDF with Links (1MB)