![logo2](/ServeContent?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heterocycles.jp%2Fclockss%2Fimg%2Fcycle.gif)
![logo2](/ServeContent?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heterocycles.jp%2Fclockss%2Fimg%2Flogo_box.gif)
HETEROCYCLES
An International Journal for Reviews and Communications in Heterocyclic ChemistryWeb Edition ISSN: 1881-0942
Published online by The Japan Institute of Heterocyclic Chemistry
e-Journal
Full Text HTML
Received, 11th September, 2014, Accepted, 14th October, 2014, Published online, 21st October, 2014.
DOI: 10.3987/COM-14-13087
■ 1-Hydroxyethylhalenaquinone: A New Proteasome Inhibitor from the Marine Sponge Xestospongia sp.
Michiko Yamakuma, Hikaru Kato, Kanae Matsuo, Ahmed H. El-Desoky, Tetsuro Kawabata, Fitje Losung, Remy E. P. Mangindaan, Nicole J. de Voogd, Hideyoshi Yokosawa, and Sachiko Tsukamoto*
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 5-1 Oe-hon-machi, Kumamoto 862-0973, Japan
Abstract
A new halenaquinone derivative, 1-hydroxyethylhalenaquinone (1), was isolated from the marine sponge Xestospongia sp. as a proteasome inhibitor together with three known compounds, halenaquinone (2) and 3-ketoadociaquinones A (3) and B (4). 1-Hydroxyethylhalenaquinone (1) was the first halenaquinone derivative containing an alkyl group at the keto-furan C-1 position. Compounds 1 and 2 inhibited the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome with IC50 values of 0.19 and 0.63 μM, respectively, whereas 3 or 4, each containing a thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide moiety, scarcely inhibited its activity, even at a concentration of 5 μM.Halenaquinone (2, Figure 1)1 is a pentacyclic compound that has been isolated from marine sponges. This compound and its derivatives are known to exhibit antimicrobial, antifungal, cytotoxic, and antimalarial activities and also inhibit various enzymes, such as v-Src tyrosine kinase,2 phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K),3 Cdc25B phosphatase,4 RAD51 (homologous-paring activity),5 phospholipase A2,6 and farnesyltransferase.6 In our search for biologically active natural products, we found that the extract of the marine sponge Xestospongia sp. inhibited proteasome activity. We here described the bioassay-guided isolation of a new halenaquinone derivative, 1-hydroxyethylhalenaquinone (1, Figure 1), and 2 as proteasome inhibitors.
The sponge collected in Likpan, North Sulawesi, Indonesia, was immediately soaked in EtOH. The EtOH extract was partitioned between EtOAc and H2O. The EtOAc-soluble fraction was purified to afford 1, 2, and 3-ketoadociaquinones A (3) and B (4)7 (Figure 1). Compound 1 was obtained as a brown amorphous solid, and HRFABMS established its molecular formula as C22H16O6. 2D NMR spectra including COSY, HSQC, and HMBC (Table 1 and Figure 2) indicated that 1 was a congener of 2, except for the presence of a hydroxyethyl group [δH 3.39 (2H, m, H2-21), 4.07 (2H, m, H2-22); δC 32.5 (C-21), 60.2 (C-22)] and quaternary carbon [δC 165.6 (C-1)] together with the absence of the sp2 methine [δH 8.25 (1H, s, H-1); δC 149.0 (C-1)] detected in 2. HMBC correlations from H2-21 to C-2 (δC 118.5) and from H2-22 to C-1 showed that the hydroxyethyl group in 1 was attached to C-1. The CD spectrum of 1 was similar to that of 2, which indicated that 1 and 2 had the same absolute configuration, 6S (Figure 3). Although various halenaquinone derivatives have been isolated from marine sponges to date, 1 was the first containing an alkyl group at the keto-furan C-1 position.
Since the synthetic proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib (VelcadeTM), was approved for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma,8 drugs targeting the proteasome and the upstream ubiquitin system have been anticipated as excellent anticancer agents.9 Therefore, we have been searching for inhibitors of the ubiquitin−proteasome system from natural sources.10 In this study, 1 and 2 were identified as inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome with IC50 values of 0.19 and 0.63 µM, respectively, while 3 and 4 scarcely inhibited its activity, even at a concentration of 5 µM. Compounds 3 and 4 contained a thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide unit that was attached to the quinone moiety. Structurally diverse proteasome inhibitors have been identified and many form covalent bonds with the active-site threonine residue of the proteasome.11 The structure-activity relationships among 1-4 suggested that the C-14 and/or C-15 positions of the quinone in 1 and 2 may undergo Michael-type 1,4-addition of the hydroxy group of the catalytic threonine residue in a manner similar to syringolin A,12 a proteasome inhibitor composed of a 12-membered lactam with an α,β-unsaturated vinyl ketone.
EXPERIMENTAL
General Experimental Procedures.
Optical rotation was measured on a JASCO DIP-1000 polarimeter in DMSO. UV spectrum was measured on a JASCO V-550 spectrophotometer in MeCN. CD spectrum was measured on a JASCO J-820 spectropolarimeter in MeCN. IR spectrum was measured on a JEOL JIR-6500W spectrophotometer. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer in CDCl3. Chemical shifts were referenced to residual solvent peaks (δH 7.24 and δC 77.0 for CDCl3). Mass spectrum was measured on a JEOL JMS-700 MStation mass spectrometer.
Biological Material.
The marine sponge was collected at a depth of 10 m in Likpan, Indonesia, in December 2006 and immediately soaked in EtOH. The sponge was identified as Xestospongia sp. A voucher specimen (RMNH POR. 8674) has been deposited in the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, The Netherlands.
Extraction and Isolation.
The marine sponge (400 g, wet weight) was extracted with EtOH. The concentrated aqueous solution was subsequently extracted with EtOAc. The EtOAc fraction (3.9 g) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography with CHCl3/MeOH (95:5) (fraction A) and CHCl3/MeOH (80:20) (fraction B). Fraction A (1.5 g) was purified by silica gel column chromatography with hexane/EtOAc (60:40) (fraction A1, 39.8 mg) and CHCl3/MeOH (80:20) (fraction A2, 471.4 mg). Fraction A1 was identified as halenaquinone (2) based on the 1H and 13C NMR spectra and FAB mass spectrum. Fraction A2 was purified by silica gel column chromatography with CHCl3/MeOH (98:2) to afford fractions A2-1 (86.3 mg) and A2-2 (104.0 mg), which were further purified by silica gel HPLC with a gradient elution from CHCl3 to CHCl3/MeOH (98:2) to afford 1-hydroxyethylhalenaquinone (1, 3.2 mg) and 3-ketoadociaquinone A (3, 10.8 mg), respectively. Fraction B (299.4 mg) was purified by Sephadex LH-20 with CH2Cl2/MeOH/H2O (6:4:1) and Diol HPLC with a gradient elution from hexane/CH2Cl2/MeOH (100:95:5) to CH2Cl2/MeOH (95:5) to afford 3-ketoadociaquinone B (4, 4.4 mg).
Measurement of Proteasome Inhibitory Activity.
The chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome was measured with a rat liver proteasome preparation using the fluorogenic substrate, Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-MCA (Peptide Institute). The proteasome in a mixture (100 µL) that contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM EDTA, and 0.02% SDS was pre-incubated with test compounds at various concentrations at 30 oC for 10 min. Then, the substrate (10 µM) was added to the mixture and the mixture was further incubated at 30 oC for 6 h. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 µL of 10% SDS and the fluorescence intensity owing to 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) was measured (excitation, 360 nm; emission, 450 nm). The value of IC50, the concentration required for 50% inhibition of proteasome inhibitory activity, was calculated from the data of duplicate measurements.
1-Hydroxyethylhalenaquinone (1): A brown amorphous solid; [α]D20 -11.5° (c 0.13, DMSO); UV (MeCN) λmax (log ε) 292 (3.92), 260 (5.01), 214 (4.16) nm; CD (MeCN), see Figure 3. IR (film) νmax 3423, 2926, 1672, 1322 cm-1; HRFABMS m/z 377.1029 [M+H]+ (calcd for C22H17O6, 377.1025); 1H and 13C NMR data (CDCl3), see Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Dr. H. Kobayashi of the University of Tokyo for collecting the sponge. This work was financially supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 18406002, 25293025, and 2605005) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
References
1. D. M. Roll, P. J. Scheuer, G. K. Matsumoto, and J. Clardy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 6177. CrossRef
2. R. H. Lee, D. L. Slate, R. Moretti, K. A. Alvi, and P. Crews, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1992, 184, 765. CrossRef
3. H. Fujiwara, K. Matsunaga, M. Saito, S. Hagiya, K. Furukawa, H. Nakamura, and Y. Ohizumi, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 2001, 413, 37. CrossRef
4. S. Cao, C. Foster, M. Brisson, J. S. Lazo, and D. G. Kingston, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2005, 13, 999. CrossRef
5. M. Takaku, T. Kainuma, T. Ishida-Takaku, S. Ishigami, H. Suzuki, S. Tashiro, R. W. van Soest, Y. Nakao, and H. Kurumizaka, Genes Cells, 2011, 16, 427. CrossRef
6. A. Longeon, B. R. Copp, M. Roué, J. Dubois, A. Valentin, S. Petek, C. Debitus, and M.-L. Bourguet-Kondracki, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2010, 18, 6006. CrossRef
7. F. J. Schmitz and S. J. Bloor, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 3922. CrossRef
8. J. Adams, Drug Discov. Today, 2003, 8, 307. CrossRef
9. (a) L. Bedford, J. Lowe, L. R. Dick, R. J. Mayer, and J. E. Brownell, Nat. Rev. Drug Disc., 2011, 10, 29; CrossRef (b) P. Cohen and M. Tcherpakov, Cell, 2010, 143, 686. CrossRef
10. (a) E1 inhibitor: R. Yamanokuchi, K. Imada, M. Miyazaki, H. Kato, T. Watanabe, M. Fujimuro, Y. Saeki, S. Yoshinaga, H. Terasawa, N. Iwasaki, H. Rotinsulu, F. Losung, R. E. P. Mangindaan, M. Namikoshi, N. J. de Voogd, H. Yokosawa, and S. Tsukamoto, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2012, 20, 4437; CrossRef (b) E2 inhibitor: S. Ushiyama, H. Umaoka, H. Kato, Y. Suwa, H. Morioka, H. Rotinsulu, F. Losung, R. E. P. Mangindaan, N. J. de Voogd, H. Yokosawa, and S. Tsukamoto, J. Nat. Prod., 2012, 75, 1495; CrossRef (c) E3 inhibitor: Y. Nakamura, H. Kato, T. Nishikawa, N. Iwasaki, Y. Suwa, H. Rotinsulu, F. Losung, W. Maarisit, R. E. P. Mangindaan, H. Morioka, H. Yokosawa, and S. Tsukamoto, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 322; CrossRef (d) Deubiquitinating enzyme inhibitor: M. Yamaguchi, M. Miyazaki, M. P. Kodrasov, H. Rotinsulu, F. Losung, R. E. P. Mangindaan, N. J. de Voogd, H. Yokosawa, B. Nicholson, and S. Tsukamoto, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2013, 23, 3884; CrossRef (e) Proteasome inhibitor: S. Tsukamoto, R. Yamanokuchi, M. Yoshitomi, K. Sato, T. Ikeda, H. Rotinsulu, R. E. P. Mangindaan, N. J. de Voogd, R. W. M. van Soest, and H. Yokosawa, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2010, 20, 3341. CrossRef
11. A. F. Kisselev, W. A. van der Linden, and H. S. Overkleeft, Chem. Biol., 2012, 19, 99. CrossRef
12. M. Groll, B. Schellenberg, A. S. Bachmann, C. R. Archer, R. Huber, T. K. Powell, S. Lindow, M. Kaiser, and R. Dudler, Nature, 2008, 452, 755. CrossRef