Current Issue Search Articles Instructions for authors
 

 HOME | Login   

 

 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 Users online: 78


  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1533    
    Printed56    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded6    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

 
 
 Table of Contents  
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 99-100   


 
LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Latrogenic glenoid rim fracture during manipulation of a posterior dislocation

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom

Correspondence Address:
Tobias K. A. Baring
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.102569

Get Permissions

 

 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Article in PDF (483 KB)
Reader Comments
Access Statistics
Citation Manager
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

Date of Web Publication17-Oct-2012



How to cite this article:
Baring TK, Ahrens PM. Latrogenic glenoid rim fracture during manipulation of a posterior dislocation. Int J Shoulder Surg 2012;6:99-100

How to cite this URL:
Baring TK, Ahrens PM. Latrogenic glenoid rim fracture during manipulation of a posterior dislocation. Int J Shoulder Surg [serial online] 2012 [cited 2016 Jul 3];6:99-100. Available from: http://www.internationalshoulderjournal.org/text.asp?2012/6/3/99/102569


Sir,

A 35 year old right hand dominant man fell off his mountain bike directly onto the anterior aspect of his left shoulder. Both initial and repeat adequate radiographs clearly showed a posterior dislocation of the left shoulder with a reverse Hill-Sacs lesion but no evidence of a glenoid fracture [1] [Figure 1]. Several attempts using both Kocher's technique [2] and the Hippocratic method [3] were made to reduce the joint in A + E with the use of intravenous midazolam and fentanyl, and inhaled entonox to sedate the patient. The post-reduction films showed the shoulder remained dislocated. No further attempt was made to perform a closed reduction. Computed tomography (CT) was performed later the same day, which showed the dislocated joint, a large reverse Hill-Sacs lesion, and the glenoid fracture which was displaced laterally into the defect [Figure 2]. The following day, the patient underwent open reduction and a modified MacLaughlin procedure. [4] The glenoid fracture reduced spontaneously into an anatomical position following reduction of the joint and therefore did not need surgical fixation.
Figure 1: Anteroposterior and axillary views of the left shoulder showing a posterior dislocation

Click here to view
Figure 2: Axial CT of the left shoulder showing the dislocated shoulder with the reverse Hill-Sacs lesion (RH) and laterally displaced fracture of the posterior glenoid rim (G)

Click here to view


We are not aware of a similar previous case where closed manipulation of a posteriorly dislocated shoulder has caused a fracture of the posterior rim of the glenoid. In this case, external rotation of the joint during incorrectly applied Kocher's technique could potentially exert enough force through the glenoid rim for it to fracture. Following the initial manipulation and iatrogenic injury, it may have been that the laterally displaced glenoid rim fracture then prevented successful reduction during closed manipulation. As the glenoid fracture was initially lateral and reduced following an open reduction, we felt that fixation was not required as this was not a typical Bankart lesion.

It would be reasonable to advise that when there is a significant delay to the diagnosis and management of a shoulder posterior dislocation, A + E staff should not attempt reduction. It would be more appropriate to seek specialist advice given that soft tissues are likely to be less pliable, and therefore there is potentially an increased risk of complication or failure to achieve reduction. We would also consider a CT scan prior to manipulation to rule out an occult fracture.

An error was made by using Kocher's technique to attempt to reduce a posterior dislocation. Furthermore, the patient was placed in a simply broad arm sling after manipulation, internally rotating the joint and in the presence of a large anterior reverse Hill-Sacs lesion. This may be another cause for failure of closed reduction. An appropriate method for reducing shoulder posterior dislocation is with abduction and external rotation or the Hippocratic technique, and once reduced, an external rotation brace should be applied.

 
   References Top

1.Connell DA, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance evaluation of the labral capsular ligamentous complex: a pictorial review. Australas Radiol 1999;43:419-26.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Hussein MK. Kocher's method is 3,000 years old. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968;50:669-71.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Waldron VD, Hazel D. Tips of the trade #37. Technique for reduction of shoulder dislocation. Orthop Rev 1991;20:563, 6.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Finkelstein JA, Waddell JP, O'Driscoll SW, Vincent G. Acute posterior fracture dislocations of the shoulder treated with the Neer modification of the McLaughlin procedure. J Orthop Trauma 1995;9:190-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder joint: Report of two cases
Sung-Chun Lin,Hsin-Pai Lee,Chih-Ju Chen,Yen-Hsuan Jean
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article