Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Particle Physics Insights

29,521 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Dyons and Magnetic Monopoles Revisited

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 17 Sep 2012

Type: Original Research

Journal: Particle Physics Insights

Citation: Particle Physics Insights 2012:5 1-12

doi: 10.4137/PPI.S9889

Abstract

We construct dyon solutions in SU(N) with topological electric and magnetic charge. Assuming a |Φ|4—like potential for the Higgs field, we show that the mass of the dyons is relatively insensitive to the coupling parameter λ characterizing the potential. We then apply the methodology of constructing dyon solutions in SU(N) to G2. In order to define the electromagnetic field consistently in the manner that we propose, we find that dyon solutions exist only when G2 is considered under the action of its maximal and regular subgroup SU(3). In this case we find two different types of dyons, one of which has properties identical to dyons in SU(3). The other dyon has some properties which are seemingly atypical, eg, the magnetic charge gm = 4π 3/e, which differs from the ‘t Hooft/Polyakov monopole where gm = 4π 3/e.


Downloads

PDF  (651.62 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)






What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
My co-authors and I had a very positive experience with the review and publication process in Evolutionary Bioinformatics.  The reviewers were rapid and on point, and publication was also rapid after we made the necessary revisions.
Professor Steven Salzberg (Director, Center for Computational Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results