Name DOI
10.1601/nm.11776
Name
 (sic) (Balkwill et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 pro synon. Sphingomonas aromaticivorans Balkwill et al. 1997
Name Status
Validly Published
Current Authority
(sic) (Balkwill et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 pro synon. Sphingomonas aromaticivorans Balkwill et al. 1997
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
species
Nomenclatural Type
(designated strain)
Refer to the type exemplar.
Taxonomy
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = = = = =)
Proper Form
Novosphingobium aromaticivorum (sic) (Balkwill et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 pro synon. Sphingomonas aromaticivorans Balkwill et al. 1997
Nomenclatural History
The species Novosphingobium aromaticivorum was originally described and validly published by Takeuchi et al. 2001. This name was affected by Judicial Opinion 81 in 2008. List Editor corrected this name from (sic) to . Hördt et al. published an emended description of this species in 2020. Takeuchi et al. formed this name in 2001 by placing the species Balkwill et al. 1997 into the genus Takeuchi et al. 2001. Yabuuchi et al. established as a later homotypic synonym of Balkwill et al. 1997 in 2002. Chaudhary et al. established this name as an earlier heterotypic synonym of corrig. (Balkwill et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 in 2021.
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Novosphingobium aromaticivorum (sic) (Balkwill et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 pro synon. Sphingomonas aromaticivorans Balkwill et al. 1997.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.11776.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on September 11, 2009.

References

  1. Euzéby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293-301. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.03022-0 [PubMed].
  2. Chaudhary DK, Dahal RH, Kim D-U, Kim J. Novosphingobium olei sp. nov., with the ability to degrade diesel oil, isolated from oil-contaminated soil and proposal to reclassify Novosphingobium stygium as a later heterotypic synonym of Novosphingobium aromaticivorans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004628 [PubMed].
  3. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27 (3) and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Opinion 81. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1755-1763. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/005264-0 [PubMed].
  4. List Editor. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 51, part 4, of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1621-1623. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-5-1621 [PubMed].
  5. Hördt A, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Weinhold L-M, Gronow S, Kyrpides N, Woyke T, Schleuning M, Göker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front. Microbio. 2020; 11:468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00468 [PubMed].
  6. Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Fujiwara N, Naka T, Matsunaga I, Ogura H, Kobayashi K. Emendation of the genus Sphingomonas Yabuuchi et al. 1990 and junior objective synonymy of the species of three genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, in conjunction with Blastomonas ursincola. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1485-1496. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-5-1485 [PubMed].
  7. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405-1417. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-4-1405 [PubMed].