Taxon DOI 10.1601/tx.41640 Names Erisaceae (sic) Hildebrand et al. 2019, Mageeibacillaceae corrig. Hildebrand et al. 2019 Taxonomic Rank family Methodology Nomenclatural Taxonomy [1980-2022] Incertae sedis taxa are placed using SOSCC (Garrity and Lilburn 2008) Parent Taxon Record Name Record order Borkfalkiales corrig. Hildebrand et al. 2019 Members genus Acetivibrio Patel et al. 1980 emend. Tindall 2019 genus Clostridium Prazmowski 1880 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Lawson and Rainey 2016 genus Pseudobacteroides Horino et al. 2014 genus Ruminiclostridium Yutin and Galperin 2013 non Ruminiclostridium Zhang et al. 2018

Type Status
Taxonomy	The taxonomic placement of this family within the root Universal Root. root   Universal Root Woese et al. 1990 domain   Bacteria (None 2015) Woese et al. 1990 phylum   Firmicutes (sic) Gibbons and Murray 2021 class   Clostridia Rainey 2010 order   Borkfalkiales corrig. Hildebrand et al. 2019 family   Erisaceae (sic) Hildebrand et al. 2019 The taxonomy from the rank of class and below is based upon currently published taxonomic opinion. For a complete taxonomy, refer to The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7.
Citation	When referring to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier. Taxon Abstract for the family Erisaceae (sic) Hildebrand et al. 2019 and Mageeibacillaceae corrig. Hildebrand et al. 2019. Retrieved April 23, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1601/tx.41640.
Source File	10.1601/tx.41640.xml

Hildebrand et al. 2019 proposed to include Ruminiclostridium Yutin and Galperin 2013 (NVP, not Zhang et al. 2018 VP). No nomenclatural type was asserted. A later correction by Hildebrand et al. 2020 cited Zhang et al. 2018 but did not clarify the circumscription of the taxon or authorities of the taxa involved. Furthermore, the correction asserted Mageeibacillus as the nomenclatural type, but Hildebrand et al. 2019 had included that taxon as the sole representative of Discordiaceae and it was not included in the circumscription of Erisaceae. It can be concluded that the correction referred to the incorrect taxon, and that this taxon lacks a nomenclatural type.

This information was last reviewed on November 24, 2021.