Taxon DOI
10.1601/tx.8156
Name
 (Mudarris et al. 1994) Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022
Taxonomic Rank
species
Methodology
Nomenclatural Taxonomy [1980-2022]
Incertae sedis taxa are placed using SOSCC (Garrity and Lilburn 2008)
Parent
Taxon RecordName Record
Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = = = = =)
Type Status
Taxonomy
The taxonomic placement of this species within the root Universal Root.
  Woese et al. 1990
  (None 2015) Woese et al. 1990
  corrig. Krieg et al. 2021
  (Cavalier-Smith 1998) Bernardet 2012
  Bernardet 2012 emend. García-López et al. 2019
  García-López et al. 2020 emend. Nicholson et al. 2020
  Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022
  (Mudarris et al. 1994) Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022

The taxonomy from the rank of class and below is based upon currently published taxonomic opinion. For a complete taxonomy, refer to The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7.
Citation
When referring to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Taxon Abstract for the species Chryseobacterium scophthalmum (Mudarris et al. 1994) Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022. Retrieved . https://doi.org/10.1601/tx.8156.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on June 1, 2022.

References

  1. Vandamme P, Bernardet JF, Segers P, Kersters K, Holmes B. New perspectives in the classification of the flavobacteria: description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:827-831. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-4-827.