|
Proper Form
| Rhodothermales Munoz et al. 2017 emend. Park et al. 2019 |
Nomenclatural History
|
The order Rhodothermales was originally proposed by Munoz et al. 2016. This name became validly published when it appeared on Validation List No. 173 in 2017. Park et al. published an emended description of this order in 2019.
|
Citation
|
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Rhodothermales Munoz et al. 2017 emend. Park et al. 2019.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.29342.
|
Source File
|
This information was last reviewed on April 1, 2019. |
References
- Munoz R, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Corrigendum to "Revised phylogeny of Bacteroidetes and proposal of sixteen new taxa and two new combinations including Rhodothermaeota phyl. nov.". Syst Appl Microbiol 2016; 39:491-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2016.08.006 [PubMed].
- Oren A, Garrity G. Validation List No. 173. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001733 [PubMed].
- Munoz R, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Revised phylogeny of Bacteroidetes and proposal of sixteen new taxa and two new combinations including Rhodothermaeota phyl. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2016; 39:281-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2016.04.004 [PubMed].
- Park M-J, Oh JH, Yang S-H, Kwon KK. Roseithermus sacchariphilus gen. nov., sp. nov. and proposal of Salisaetaceae fam. nov., representing new family in the order Rhodothermales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1213-1219. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003293 [PubMed].