|
Proper Form
| Armatimonadaeota corrig. Tamaki et al. 2021 |
Nomenclatural History
|
The phylum Armatimonadaeota was originally proposed by Tamaki et al. 2011. This name was validly published by Oren and Garrity 2021. Oren et al. corrected this name from Armatimonadota (sic) to Armatimonadaeota .
|
Citation
|
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Armatimonadaeota corrig. Tamaki et al. 2021.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.42405.
|
Source File
|
This information was last reviewed on March 14, 2022. |
References
- Oren A, Garrity GM. Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:005056. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005056.
- Tamaki H, Tanaka Y, Matsuzawa H, Muramatsu M, Meng X-Y, Hanada S, Mori K, Kamagata Y. Armatimonas rosea gen. nov., sp. nov., of a novel bacterial phylum, Armatimonadetes phyl. nov., formally called the candidate phylum OP10. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1442-1447. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.025643-0 [PubMed].
- Rappé MS, Giovannoni SJ. The uncultured microbial majority. Annu Rev Microbiol 2003; 57:369-394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090759 [PubMed].
- Oren A, da Costa MS, Garrity GM, Rainey FA, Rosselló-Móra R, Schink B, Sutcliffe I, Trujillo ME, Whitman WB. Proposal to include the rank of phylum in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4284-4287. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000664 [PubMed].