|
Martin Richardson1, Saeed Asadollahi2, Louise Richardson3
1 Department of Orthopaedic, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
2 Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
3 Medical Student, Melbourne University VIC 3010, Australia
Correspondence Address:
Martin Richardson
The Epworth Healthcare Level 7, Suit 7.5, 32 Erin Street, Richmond VIC 3121
Australia
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | 6 |
DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.114227
Purpose: A new and simple operative technique has been developed to provide internal fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures. This involves the use of a large fragment Herbert Screw that is entirely embedded within the bone. Screw fixation is combined with bone grafting from intramedullary reamings of the fracture fragments. The purpose of this report is to assess the outcomes following treatment of midshaft clavicular fracture using this method.
Materials and Methods: One hundred and fourteen patients with acute displaced midshaft fracture were identified between 2002 and 2007. All patients were followed until fracture union. Patients' medical records were reviewed. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow form (ASES) were posted to all patients. Outcome measures included union rate, time to union, implant removal rate, DASH, and ASES scores.
Results: Patients' median age was 29.5 years (interquartile range, 19-44 years). The most common injury mechanism was sports injury (28%). The median time from injury to surgery was 5 days (interquartile range, 2-9 days). Union occurred in an average of 8.8 weeks. Non-union occurred in three cases (2.6%). The re-operation rate for symptomatic hardware prominence screw was 1.7%. The median DASH score was 0.83 and the median ASES was 100 (n = 35).
Conclusions: Intramedullary fixation using cannulated Herbert screw can be used as an effective approach for operative management of midshaft clavicular fractures. Using this method, an appropriate outcome could be achieved and a second intervention for implant removal could be avoided in great majority of cases.
Level of Evidence: Level III
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
|
Search Pubmed for
