Next article Search Articles Instructions for authors  Access Statistics | Citation Manager  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
[LN]

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed953    
    Printed36    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded6    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions: Clinical and anatomic follow-up


1 Department of Orthopaedics, Concord Public Hospital, Concord, NSW 2137, Australia
2 Department of Surgery, Campbell River Hospital, 375 2nd Avenue, Campbell River, BC V9W 3V1, Canada
3 Department of Surgery, Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, McCaig Institute of Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
4 Department of Radiology, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada

Correspondence Address:
Ian KY Lo
Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: This research was supported by a grant from the Workers’ Compension Board of Alberta., Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.161434

Rights and Permissions

Year : 2015  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 74-80

 

SEARCH
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles

  Article in PDF (996 KB)
Email article
Print Article
Add to My List
Aims: The aim was to evaluate the clinical and anatomic outcome of arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions. Materials and Methods: The senior author performed isolated repairs of 25 type II SLAP lesions in 25 patients with a mean age of 40.0 ± 12 years. All tears were repaired using standard arthroscopic suture anchor repair to bone. All patients were reviewed using a standardized clinical examination by a blinded, independent observer, and using several shoulder outcome measures. Patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram at a minimum of 1-year postoperatively. Statistical Analysis Used: Two-tailed paired t-test were used to determine significant differences in preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes scores. In addition, a Fisher's exact test was used. Results: At a mean follow-up of 54-month, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Index (ASES) scores improved from 52.1 preoperatively to 86.1 postoperatively (P < 0.0001) and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores from 7.7 to 10.6 (P < 0.0002). Twenty-two out of the 25 patients (88%) stated that they would have surgery again. Of the 21 patients who had postoperative magnetic resonance imaging arthrographys (MRAs), 9 patients (43%) demonstrated dye tracking between the labrum bone interface suggestive of a recurrent tear and 12 patients (57%) had a completely intact repair. There was no significant difference in ASES, SST, and patient satisfaction scores in patients with recurrent or intact repairs. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes. However, MRA imaging demonstrated 43% of patients with recurrent tears. MRA results do not necessarily correlate with clinical outcome.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
 

 


 

 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 
 
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
  *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 
 ORIGINAL ARTICLE
 




1 Department of Orthopaedics, Concord Public Hospital, Concord, NSW 2137, Australia
2 Department of Surgery, Campbell River Hospital, 375 2nd Avenue, Campbell River, BC V9W 3V1, Canada
3 Department of Surgery, Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, McCaig Institute of Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
4 Department of Radiology, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada

Correspondence Address:
Ian KY Lo
Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: This research was supported by a grant from the Workers’ Compension Board of Alberta., Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.161434

Rights and Permissions

Aims: The aim was to evaluate the clinical and anatomic outcome of arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions. Materials and Methods: The senior author performed isolated repairs of 25 type II SLAP lesions in 25 patients with a mean age of 40.0 ± 12 years. All tears were repaired using standard arthroscopic suture anchor repair to bone. All patients were reviewed using a standardized clinical examination by a blinded, independent observer, and using several shoulder outcome measures. Patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram at a minimum of 1-year postoperatively. Statistical Analysis Used: Two-tailed paired t-test were used to determine significant differences in preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes scores. In addition, a Fisher's exact test was used. Results: At a mean follow-up of 54-month, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Index (ASES) scores improved from 52.1 preoperatively to 86.1 postoperatively (P < 0.0001) and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores from 7.7 to 10.6 (P < 0.0002). Twenty-two out of the 25 patients (88%) stated that they would have surgery again. Of the 21 patients who had postoperative magnetic resonance imaging arthrographys (MRAs), 9 patients (43%) demonstrated dye tracking between the labrum bone interface suggestive of a recurrent tear and 12 patients (57%) had a completely intact repair. There was no significant difference in ASES, SST, and patient satisfaction scores in patients with recurrent or intact repairs. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes. However, MRA imaging demonstrated 43% of patients with recurrent tears. MRA results do not necessarily correlate with clinical outcome.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article